Author:
Hale Luke,Linley Emma,Kalaskar Deepak M.
Abstract
AbstractThis study demonstrates the development and application of a novel workflow for designing and fabricating orthoses, using a combination of 3D scanning and 3D printing technologies. The workflow is applied to a clinically relevant translational case study in a patient with a neurological disorder and complex clinical needs. All traditional and commercial approaches to helping the patient’s cervical instability and resulting ‘head-drop’ had previously failed, with associated progressive deterioration in the patient’s clinical state and posture. The workflow was developed to design and fabricate a bespoke device for this patient with no viable alternative therapy. The workflow was developed to generate 3D printable geometry from obtained 3D scan data. The workflow includes algorithms to relax geometry, distribute material efficiently and for variational cutting of orthosis padding material. The 3D patient scan was validated against actual measurements to ensure accuracy of measurements. A total of four prototypes were produced with each iteration being improved based on patient and clinical feedback. There was a progressive improvement in subjective feedback through each iteration at sites of discomfort and overall comfort score. There was a marked improvement in the patient’s posture with correction at the cervical and lumbar spine with the 3D-printed padded collar being worn for 4 hour periods. This study has implications for the rapid production of personalised orthoses which can help reduce patient waiting time, improve patient compliance, reduce pain and reduce further deterioration. The workflow could form the basis for an integrated process, whereby a single hospital visit results in a bespoke orthosis optimised and personalised for each patient.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference35 articles.
1. International Committee of the Red Cross. Manufacturing guidelines: Lower Limb and Upper Limb Orthoses, 2006.
2. British Association of Prosthetists and Orthotists. Standards for best practice. Paisley: British Association of Prosthetists and Orthotists, 2013.
3. Ahmed, H. et al. From Improved Diagnostics to Presurgical Planning: High-Resolution Functionally Graded Multimaterial 3D Printing of Biomedical Tomographic Data Sets. 3D Print. Addit Manuf 5, 103–113 (2018).
4. Garcia, J., Yang, Z., Mongrain, R., Leask, R. L. & Lachapelle, K. 3D printing materials and their use in medical education: a review of current technology and trends for the future. BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning 4, 27–40 (2018).
5. Chen, R. K., Jin Y-a, Wensman, J. & Shih, A. Additive manufacturing of custom orthoses and prostheses—A review. Additive Manufacturing 12, 77–89 (2016).
Cited by
48 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献