Author:
Palatinus Zsolt,Volosin Márta,Csábi Eszter,Hallgató Emese,Hajnal Edina,Lukovics Miklós,Prónay Szabolcs,Ujházi Tamás,Osztobányi Lilla,Szabó Balázs,Králik Tamás,Majó-Petri Zoltán
Abstract
AbstractThe goal of the present study is to examine the cognitive/affective physiological correlates of passenger travel experience in autonomously driven transportation systems. We investigated the social acceptance and cognitive aspects of self-driving technology by measuring physiological responses in real-world experimental settings using eye-tracking and EEG measures simultaneously on 38 volunteers. A typical test run included human-driven (Human) and Autonomous conditions in the same vehicle, in a safe environment. In the spectrum analysis of the eye-tracking data we found significant differences in the complex patterns of eye movements: the structure of movements of different magnitudes were less variable in the Autonomous drive condition. EEG data revealed less positive affectivity in the Autonomous condition compared to the human-driven condition while arousal did not differ between the two conditions. These preliminary findings reinforced our initial hypothesis that passenger experience in human and machine navigated conditions entail different physiological and psychological correlates, and those differences are accessible using state of the art in-world measurements. These useful dimensions of passenger experience may serve as a source of information both for the improvement and design of self-navigating technology and for market-related concerns.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference65 articles.
1. Xu, Z. et al. What drives people to accept automated vehicles? Findings from a field experiment. Transp. Res. C 95, 320–334 (2018).
2. Abdur-Rahim, J. et al. Multi-sensor based state prediction for personal mobility vehicles. PLoS ONE 11, e0162593 (2016).
3. Lee, J. & Yang, J. H. Analysis of driver’s EEG given take-over alarm in SAE level 3 automated driving in a simulated environment. Int. J. Automot. Technol. 21, 719–728 (2020).
4. Park, C., Shahrdar, S. & Nojoumian, M. EEG-based classification of emotional state using an autonomous vehicle simulator. in 2018 IEEE 10th Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop (SAM) 297–300 (IEEE, 2018).
5. Seet, M. et al. Differential Impact of Autonomous Vehicle Malfunctions on Human Trust. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (2020).
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献