Author:
Dayer Alex,Aswamenakul Chanuwas,Turner Matthew A.,Nicolay Scott,Wang Emily,Shurik Katherine,Holbrook Colin
Abstract
AbstractBelief in powerful supernatural agents that enforce moral norms has been theoretically linked with cooperative altruism and prosociality. Correspondingly, prior research reveals an implicit association between atheism and extreme antisociality (e.g., serial murder). However, findings centered on associations between lack of faith and moral transgression do not directly address the hypothesized conceptual association between religious belief and prosociality. Accordingly, we conducted two pre-registered experiments depicting a “serial helper” to assess biases related to extraordinary helpfulness, mirroring designs depicting a serial killer used in prior cross-cultural work. In both a predominantly religious society (the U.S., Study 1) and a predominantly secular society (New Zealand, Study 2), we successfully replicated previous research linking atheism with transgression, and obtained evidence for a substantially stronger conceptual association between religiosity and virtue. The results suggest that stereotypes linking religiosity with prosociality are both real and global in scale.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference26 articles.
1. Atran, S. In Gods We Trust (Oxford University Press, 2002).
2. Johnson, D. God’s punishment and public goods. Hum. Nat. 16(4), 410–446 (2005).
3. Shariff, A. F., Norenzayan, A. & Henrich, J. The birth of high gods: How the cultural evolution of supernatural policing influenced the emergence of complex, cooperative human societies, paving the way for civilization. In Evolution, Culture, and the Human Mind (eds Schaller, M. et al.) 119–136 (Psychology Press, 2010).
4. McKay, R. T., Efferson, C., Whitehouse, H. & Fehr, E. Wrath of God: Religious primes and punishment. Proc. R. Soc. B 278(1713), 1858–1863 (2011).
5. Fitouchi, L. & Singh, M. Supernatural punishment beliefs as cognitively compelling tools of social control. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 44, 252–257 (2022).