Author:
Sodré Denilson José Ribeiro
Abstract
AbstractSeveral approaches have been proposed to classify soil types using both cone and piezocone penetration tests. The chart relating the normalized cone resistance (Qtn) and the friction ratio (Fr) has proven to be the most reliable method. However, its practical use requires function fitting, where the chart is described by means of a soil behaviour type index. The currently available indexes for this chart, based on concentric circles and hyperbolas, lead to significant errors. Thus, to properly represent the Qtn–Fr chart, this study proposes new soil behaviour type indexes based on an analytical approach from a concentric logarithmic spiral approximation and a numerical approach from an exponential function approximation. The new indexes provide an improvement in the reproduction of the soil type zones while preserving the robustness of the original method. A discussion on the cone penetration test-based soil type classification is presented, along with a case example comparing the soil behaviour indexes in soil profiling.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference88 articles.
1. Douglas, B. J. & Olsen, R. S. Soil classification using electric cone penetrometer. Proceedings of the Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing and Experience, Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE. St. Louis, Missouri, United States, 209–227 (1981).
2. Robertson, P. K. Soil classification using the cone penetration test. Can. Geotech. J. 27(1), 151–158 (1990).
3. Robertson, P. K. Interpretation of cone penetration tests – a unified approach. Can. Geotech. J. 46(11), 1337–1355 (2009).
4. Robertson, P. K. & Wride, C. E. Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test. Can. Geotech. J. 35(3), 442–459 (1998).
5. Schneider, J. A., Hotstream, J. N., Mayne, P. W. & Randolph, M. F. Comparing CPTU Q-F and Q–∆u2σvo’ soil classification charts. Géotech. Lett. 2(4), 209–215 (2012).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献