Author:
Neu Heather M.,Lee Angela,Brandis Joel E. P.,Patel Vyomesh,Schneider Abraham,Kane Maureen A.,Dalby Richard N.,Michel Sarah L. J.
Abstract
AbstractElectronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) are prefilled, battery-operated products intended to deliver nicotine to the user via an inhaled complex aerosol formed by heating a liquid composed of propylene glycol and glycerol, also referred to as vegetable glycerin and collectively called e-liquid, that contains nicotine and various flavor ingredients. Since their introduction in 2006, the number of ENDS on the market has increased exponentially. Despite their growing ubiquity, the possible health risks associated with ENDS use remain poorly understood. One potential concern is the presence of toxic metals in the e-liquid and aerosol. Herein, we report the evaluation of the metal content in the e-liquids from a series of commercially available cigalike ENDS brands (various flavors) determined using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) following e-liquid extraction. Each brand of cigalike ENDS was purchased at least three times at retail outlets in the Baltimore, Maryland metropolitan region over a period of six months (September 2017 to February 2018). This allowed for comparison of batch-to-batch variability. Several potentially toxic metals, including lead, chromium, copper, and nickel were detected in the e-liquids. In addition, high variability in metal concentrations within and between brands and flavors was observed . The internal assembled parts of each cartridge were analyzed by X-ray imaging, before dissembling so that the materials used to manufacture each cartridge could be evaluated to determine the metals they contained. Following washing to remove traces of e-liquid, lead, chromium, copper and nickel were all detected in the cigalike ENDS prefilled cartridges, suggesting one potential source for the metals found in the e-liquids. Collectively, these findings can inform further evaluation of product design and manufacturing processes, including quantification of metal concentrations in e-liquids over foreseeable storage times, safeguards against high concentrations of metals in the e-liquid before and after aerosolization (by contact with a metal heating coil), and control over batch-to-batch variability.
Funder
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference39 articles.
1. Glasser, A. M. et al. Overview of electronic nicotine delivery systems: a systematic review. Am. J. Prev. Med. 52, e33–e66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.036 (2017).
2. Saitta, D., Chowdhury, A., Ferro, G. A., Nalis, F. G. & Polosa, R. A risk assessment matrix for public health principles: the case for E-Cigarettes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14040363 (2017).
3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, E-Cigarette Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General (National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (US) Office on Smoking and Health. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2016).
4. Hsu, G., Sun, J. Y. & Zhu, S. H. Evolution of electronic cigarette brands from 2013–2014 to 2016–2017: analysis of brand websites. J. Med. Internet Res. 20, e80. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8550 (2018).
5. Accurary Research LLP, Global E-Cigarette and Vaporizer Market Analysis & Trends—Industry Forecast to 2025. (2017).
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献