Author:
McPhail Steven M.,Wiseman Jodie,Simons Megan,Kimble Roy,Tyack Zephanie
Abstract
AbstractOptimal burn scar management has the potential to markedly improve the lives of children, but can require substantial healthcare resources. The study aimed to examine the cost-effectiveness of three scar management interventions: pressure garment; topical silicone gel; combined pressure garment and topical silicone gel therapy, alongside a randomised controlled trial of these interventions. Participants were children (n = 153) referred for burn scar management following grafting, spontaneous healing after acute burn injury, or reconstructive surgery. Healthcare resource use was costed from a health service perspective (6-months post-burn time-horizon). The mean total scar management cost was lowest in the topical silicone gel group ($382.87 (95% CI $337.72, $443.29)) compared to the pressure garment ($1327.02 (95% CI $1081.46, $1659.95)) and combined intervention $1605.97 ($1077.65, $2694.23)) groups. There were no significant between-group differences in Quality Adjusted Life Year estimates. There was a 70% probability that topical silicone gel dominated pressure garment therapy (was cheaper and more effective), a 29% probability that pressure garment therapy dominated combined therapy, and a 63% probability that topical silicone gel dominated combined therapy. In conclusion, topical silicone gel was the cheaper intervention, and may be favoured in the absence of clear clinical effect favouring pressure garment therapy or a combination of these management approaches.Trial registration: ACTRN12616001100482 (prospectively registered).
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Queensland University of Technology
Children’s Hospital Foundation Top-Up Scholarship
Australian Government Research Training Scholarship
University of Queensland
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. Smolle, C. et al. Recent trends in burn epidemiology worldwide: A systematic review. Burns 43(2), 249–257 (2017).
2. Wallace, H. J., Fear, M. W., Crowe, M. M., Martin, L. J. & Wood, F. M. Identification of factors predicting scar outcome after burn injury in children: A prospective case-control study. Burns Trauma 5(1), 19 (2017).
3. Kidd, L. R., Nguyen, D. Q., Lyons, S. C. & Dickson, W. A. Following up the follow up–long-term complications in paediatric burns. Burns 39(1), 55–60 (2013).
4. Wiseman, J. et al. Effectiveness of topical silicone gel and pressure garment therapy for burn scar prevention and management in children: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 18(1), 72 (2017).
5. Friedstat, J. S. & Hultman, C. S. Hypertrophic burn scar management: what does the evidence show? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Ann. Plast. Surg. 72(6), S198-201 (2014).