Author:
Son Keunbada,Son Young-Tak,Lee Ji-Min,Lee Kyu-Bok
Abstract
AbstractThis study evaluated the marginal and internal fit and intaglio surface trueness of interim crowns fabricated from tooth preparation scanned at four finish line locations. The right maxillary first molar tooth preparation model was fabricated using a ceramic material and placed in four finish line locations (supragingival, equigingival, subgingival, and subgingival with a cord). Intraoral scanning was performed. Crowns were designed based on the scanned area. Interim crowns were fabricated using a stereolithography three-dimensional (3D) printer (N = 16 per location). Marginal and internal fit were evaluated with a silicone replica technique. Intaglio surface trueness was evaluated using a 3D inspection software. One-way analysis of variance and Tukey HSD test were performed for comparisons (α = 0.05). The marginal and internal fit showed significant differences according to locations (P < 0.05); the marginal fit showed the best results in the supragingival finish line (P < 0.05). Intaglio surface trueness was significantly different in the marginal region, with the highest value in the subgingival location (P < 0.05). Crowns fabricated on the subgingival finish line caused inaccurate marginal fit due to poor fabrication reproducibility of the marginal region. The use of an intraoral scanner should be decided on the clinical situation and needs.
Funder
Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference36 articles.
1. Zarone, F. et al. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis. J. Prosthet. Dent. 124, 761–767 (2020).
2. Rodrigues, S. B., Franken, P., Celeste, R. K., Leitune, V. C. B. & Collares, F. M. CAD/CAM or conventional ceramic materials restorations longevity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Prosthodont. Res. 63, 389–395 (2019).
3. Coelho, C. et al. Comparison of CAD-CAM and traditional chairside processing of 4-unit interim prostheses with and without cantilevers: Mechanics, fracture behavior, and finite element analysis. J. Prosthet. Dent. 125, 543e1–543e10 (2021).
4. Winkler, J. & Gkantidis, N. Trueness and precision of intraoral scanners in the maxillary dental arch: An in vivo analysis. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–11 (2020).
5. Kim, R. J. Y., Benic, G. I. & Park, J. M. Trueness of ten intraoral scanners in determining the positions of simulated implant scan bodies. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–9 (2021).
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献