Author:
Liu Xiaohui,Zhang Manyin,Sun Zhizhong,Zhang Huyuan,Zhang Yimin
Abstract
AbstractThe comprehensive evaluation of pipeline loess collapsibility risk is a necessary means to control the safety risks of pipelines in the collapsible loess section. It is also one of the critical scientific bases for risk prevention, control, and management. The comprehensive evaluation system of cloud theory consists of quantitative and qualitative indexes, and the evaluation system has the characteristics of randomness and fuzziness. In view of this problem, the standard qualitative and semi-quantitative evaluation methods have intense subjectivity in dealing with the uncertainty problems such as randomness and fuzziness of the system, the cloud theory, which can effectively reflect the randomness and fuzziness of things at the same time, is introduced. The state scale cloud and index importance weight cloud of pipeline loess collapse risk are constructed by the golden section method. The uncertainty cloud reasoning process of the quantitative indexes and the expert scoring method of the qualitative indexes are proposed. The comprehensive evaluation model of loess collapsibility risk of oil and gas pipeline is established, and the engineering example is analyzed. The complete evaluation results of 10 samples to be evaluated are consistent with the results of the semi-quantitative method and are compatible with the actual situation. The evaluation process softens the subjective division of index boundary, simplifies the preprocessing of index data, realizes the organic integration of quantitative and qualitative decisions, and improves the accuracy, rationality, and visualization of the results.
Funder
The National Natural Science Foundation of China
The Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program
The Applied Research and Development Project of Gansu Academy of Sciences
The Innovation Team Project of Gansu Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference41 articles.
1. Girgin, S., & Krausmann, E. Analysis of pipeline accidents induced by natural hazards: final report. Eur. Union: ResearchGate (2016).
2. National Energy Administration, People's Republic of China. SY/T 6828–2017, Technical Specification for Geological Hazards Risk Management of Oil and Gas Pipeline. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press Ltd (2017).
3. Girgin, S. & Krausmann, E. Historical analysis of U.S. onshore hazardous liquid pipeline accidents triggered by natural hazards. J. Loss Prevent Proc. 40, 578–590 (2016).
4. Wang, Y. & Zhou, L. Spatial distribution and mechanism of geological hazards along the oil pipeline planned in western China. Eng. Geol. 51, 195–201 (1999).
5. Fu, P., Liu, G. & Liu, C. The study on the loess sinkhole hazard along a long-distance pipeline in the collapsible loess area. West-China Explor. Eng. 2, 21–25 (2010).
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献