Author:
Velásquez N.,Manrique P.,Sear R.,Leahy R.,Restrepo N. Johnson,Illari L.,Lupu Y.,Johnson N. F.
Abstract
AbstractDisrupting the emergence and evolution of potentially violent online extremist movements is a crucial challenge. Extremism research has analyzed such movements in detail, focusing on individual- and movement-level characteristics. But are there system-level commonalities in the ways these movements emerge and grow? Here we compare the growth of the Boogaloos, a new and increasingly prominent U.S. extremist movement, to the growth of online support for ISIS, a militant, terrorist organization based in the Middle East that follows a radical version of Islam. We show that the early dynamics of these two online movements follow the same mathematical order despite their stark ideological, geographical, and cultural differences. The evolution of both movements, across scales, follows a single shockwave equation that accounts for heterogeneity in online interactions. These scientific properties suggest specific policies to address online extremism and radicalization. We show how actions by social media platforms could disrupt the onset and ‘flatten the curve’ of such online extremism by nudging its collective chemistry. Our results provide a system-level understanding of the emergence of extremist movements that yields fresh insight into their evolution and possible interventions to limit their growth.
Funder
Air Force Office of Scientific Research
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. Banning a Violent Network in the US. Facebook (accessed 30 June 2020); https://about.fb.com/news/2020/06/banning-a-violent-network-in-the-us/.
2. Owen, T. Congress Just Got an Earful About the Threat of the Boogaloo Movement. Vice News (accessed 16 July 2020); https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/z3eqbx/congress-just-got-an-earful-about-the-threat-of-the-boogaloo-movement.
3. MacNab, J. J. Assessing the Threat from Accelerationists and Militia Extremists Before the Subcommittee on Intelligence and Counterterrorism Committee on Homeland Security (Report) 5 (2020). https://web.archive.org/web/20200729031049/https://docs.house.gov/meetings/HM/HM05/20200716/110911/HMTG-116-HM05-Wstate-MacNabJ-20200716.pdf.
4. Gill, P. et al. Terrorist use of the internet by the numbers. Criminol. Public Policy 16, 99 (2017).
5. Clemmow, C., Schumann, S., Salman, N. L. & Gill, P. The base rate study: developing base rates for risk factors and indicators for engagement in violent extremism. J. Forensic Sci. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14282 (2020).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献