Carbon sequestration and credit potential of gamhar (Gmelina arborea Roxb.) based agroforestry system for zero carbon emission of India
-
Published:2024-02-28
Issue:1
Volume:14
Page:
-
ISSN:2045-2322
-
Container-title:Scientific Reports
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sci Rep
Author:
Kumar Abhay,Malik M. S.,Shabnam Swati,Kumar Rakesh,Karmakar S.,Das Soumitra Sankar,Lakra Kerobim,Singh Indra,Kumar Rikesh,Sinha Asha Kumari,Barla Sheela,Kumari Nargis,Oraon P. R.,Prasad Muneshwar,Hasan Wajid,Mahto Dinesh,Kumar Jeetendra
Abstract
AbstractThe agroforestry system is the best option to achieve the net zero carbon emissions target for India. Keeping this view, carbon sequestration and credit potential of gamhar based agroforestry system has been assessed. The experiment was carried out in randomized block design in seven different treatments with five replications. Gamhar tree biomass accumulation was higher in gamhar based agroforestry system compared to sole gamhar. Among different tree components, stem contributed a maximum to total gamhar tree biomass followed by roots, leaves and branches. The average contributions of stems, roots, leaves and branches in total tree biomass in two annual cycles (2016–17 and 2017–18) varied between 50 and 60, 19.8 and 20, 19.2 and 20, and 10.7 and 12.7 percent, respectively. In case of crops, above ground, below ground and total biomass was significantly higher in sole intercrops than gamhar based agroforestry system. Total (Tree + interrops + Soil) carbon stock, carbon sequestration, carbon credit and carbon price were significantly affected by treatments, and was maximum in Sole Greengram-Mustard. Net carbon emission was also recorded lowest in Sole Greengram-Mustard for which the values were 811.55% and 725.24% and 760.69% lower than Sole Gamhar in 2016–17, 2017–18 and in pooled data, respectively.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference46 articles.
1. Rai, P., Vineeta, Shukla, G., Manohar, K. A., Bhat, J.A., Kumar, A., Kumar, M., Cabral-Pinto, M. & Chakravarty, S. Carbon Storage of single tree and mixed tree dominant species stands in a reserve forest-case study of the Eastern Sub-Himalayan region of India. Land 10, 435. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10040435 (2021). 2. World Bank. Total greenhouse gas emissions (CO2 equivalent)-India. World Bank, Washington DC. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM. GHGT .KT.CE?locations=IN (2022). 3. MoEFCC. India: third biennial update report to the United Nations Framework Convention on climate change. Ministry of environment, forests and climate change, Government of India, New Delhi. Available from: https://unfccc.int/documents/268470 (2021). 4. Verma, K., Sharma, P., Kumar, D., Vishwakarma, S. P. & Meena, N. K. Strategies sustainable management of agroforestry in climate change mitigation and adaptation. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 10, 2439–2449. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2021.1001.282 (2021). 5. Baboo, B., Sagar, R., Bargali, S. S. & Verma, H. Tree species composition, regeneration and diversity of an Indian dry tropical forest protected area. Trop. Ecol. 58(2), 409–423 (2017).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|