Author:
Mizukoshi Ryo,Yagi Mitsuru,Yamada Yoshitake,Yokoyama Yoichi,Yamada Minoru,Watanabe Kota,Nakamura Masaya,Nagura Takeo,Jinzaki Masahiro
Abstract
AbstractLumbar spinal alignment is crucial for spine biomechanics and is linked to various spinal pathologies. However, limited research has explored gender-specific differences using CT scans. The objective was to evaluate and compare lumbar spinal alignment between standing and sitting CT in healthy individuals, focusing on gender differences. 24 young and 25 elderly males (M) and females (F) underwent standing and sitting CT scans to assess lumbar spinal alignment. Parameters measured and compared between genders included lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), lordotic angle (LA), foraminal height (FH), and bony boundary area (BBA). Females showed significantly larger changes in SS and PT when transitioning from standing to sitting (p = .044, p = .038). A notable gender difference was also observed in the L4-S LA among the elderly, with females showing a significantly larger decrease in lordotic angle compared to males (− 14.1° vs. − 9.2°, p = .039*). Females consistently exhibited larger FH and BBA values, particularly in lower lumbar segments, which was more prominent in the elderly group (M vs. F: L4/5 BBA 80.1 mm2 [46.3, 97.8] vs. 109.7 mm2 [74.4, 121.3], p = .019 in sitting). These findings underline distinct gender-related variations in lumbar alignment and flexibility, with a focus on noteworthy changes in BBA and FH in females. Gender differences in lumbar spinal alignment were evident, with females displaying greater pelvic and sacral mobility. Considering gender-specific characteristics is crucial for assessing spinal alignment and understanding spinal pathologies. These findings contribute to our understanding of lumbar spinal alignment and have implications for gender-specific spinal conditions and treatments.
Funder
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Takeda Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference17 articles.
1. Botchu, R., Bharath, A., Davies, A. M., Butt, S. & James, S. L. Current concept in upright spinal MRI. Eur Spine J. 27, 987–993 (2018).
2. Kimura, T. et al. Evaluation of first-ray mobility in patients with hallux valgus using weight-bearing CT and a 3-D analysis system: A comparison with normal feet. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 99-A(3), 247–55 (2017).
3. Sano, H. et al. The difference of sagittal lumbo-pelvic alignment in standing and sitting position; analysis differences and aging. J. Tokyo Med. Univ. 81(1), 49–54 (2023).
4. Hey, H. W. et al. Differences in erect sitting and natural siting spinal alignment-insights into a new paradigm and implications in deformity correction. Spinal J. 17, 183–189 (2017).
5. Endo, K. et al. Sagittal lumbar and pelvic alignment in the standing and sitting positions. J. Orthop. Sci. 17, 682–686 (2012).