Author:
Qin Changcai,Che Dezhao,Liu Dongxue,Zhang Zefei,Feng Yihua
Abstract
AbstractThe preparation of controllable micro/nano structures on the surface of the bredigite scaffold is expected to exhibit the same support and osteoconductive capabilities as living bone. However, the hydrophobicity of the white calciμm silicate scaffold surface restricts the adhesion and spreading of osteoblasts. Furthermore, during the degradation process of the bredigite scaffold, the release of Ca2+ results in an alkaline environment around the scaffold, which inhibits the growth of osteoblasts. In this study, the three-dimensional geometry of the Primitive surface in the three-periodic minimal surface with an average curvature of 0 was used as the basis for the scaffold unit cell, and a white hydroxyapatite scaffold was fabricated via photopolymerization-based 3D printing. Nanoparticles, microparticles, and micro-sheet structures with thicknesses of 6 μm, 24 μm, and 42 μm, respectively, were prepared on the surface of the porous scaffold through a hydrothermal reaction. The results of the study indicate that the micro/nano surface did not affect the morphology and mineralization ability of the macroporous scaffold. However, the transition from hydrophobic to hydrophilic resulted in a rougher surface and an increase in compressive strength from 45 to 59–86 MPa, while the adhesion of the micro/nano structures enhanced the scaffold's ductility. In addition, after 8 days of degradation, the pH of the degradation solution decreased from 8.6 to around 7.6, which is more suitable for cell growth in the hμman body. However, there were issues of slow degradation and high P element concentration in the degradation solution for the microscale layer group during the degradation process, so the nanoparticle and microparticle group scaffolds could provide effective support and a suitable environment for bone tissue repair.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference45 articles.
1. Saini, M., Singh, Y., Arora, P., Arora, V. & Jain, K. Implant biomaterials: A comprehensive review. World J. Clin. Cases 3(1), 52–57 (2015).
2. Liu, X. & Ma, P. X. Polymeric scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 32, 477–486 (2004).
3. Lutton, P. & Ben-Nissan, B. The status of biomaterials for orthopedic and dental applications: Part II -bioceramics in orthopedic and dental applications. Mater. Technol. 12(3–4), 107–111 (2016).
4. Valletregi, M. Calciμm phosphates as substitution of bone tissues. Prog. Solid State Chem. 32(1–2), 1–31 (2004).
5. Shuai, C. et al. In situ synthesis of hydroxyapatite nanorods on graphene oxide nanosheets and their reinforcement in biopolymer scaffold. J. Adv. Res. 35, 13–24 (2022).
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献