Author:
Dölker Eva-Maria,Lau Stephan,Bernhard Maria Anne,Haueisen Jens
Abstract
AbstractOur long-term goal is the development of a wearable warning system that uses electrocutaneous stimulation. To find appropriate stimulation parameters and electrode configurations, we investigate perception amplitude thresholds and qualitative perceptions of electrocutaneous stimulation for varying pulse widths, electrode sizes, and electrode positions. The upper right arm was stimulated in 81 healthy volunteers with biphasic rectangular current pulses varying between 20 and $$2000\,\upmu \hbox {s}$$
2000
μ
s
. We determined perception, attention, and intolerance thresholds and the corresponding qualitative perceptions for 8 electrode pairs distributed around the upper arm. For a pulse width of $$150\,\upmu \hbox {s}$$
150
μ
s
, we find median values of 3.5, 6.9, and 13.8 mA for perception, attention, and intolerance thresholds, respectively. All thresholds decrease with increasing pulse width. Lateral electrode positions have higher intolerance thresholds than medial electrode positions, but perception and attention threshold are not significantly different across electrode positions. Electrode size between $$15 \times 15\,\hbox {mm}^{2}$$
15
×
15
mm
2
and $$40\times 40\,\hbox {mm}^{2}$$
40
×
40
mm
2
has no significant influence on the thresholds. Knocking is the prevailing perception for perception and attention thresholds while mostly muscle twitching, pinching, and stinging are reported at the intolerance threshold. Biphasic stimulation pulse widths between $$150\,\upmu \hbox {s}$$
150
μ
s
and $$250\,\upmu \hbox {s}$$
250
μ
s
are suitable for electric warning wearables. Within the given practical limits at the upper arm, electrode size, inter-electrode distance, and electrode position are flexible parameters of electric warning wearables. Our investigations provide the basis for electric warning wearables.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
European Regional Development Fund
Technische Universität Ilmenau
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference35 articles.
1. Arz, J.-P., Gettliffe, J.-P. & Delattre, P. Effect of wearing hearing protectors on the audibility of railway warning signals—An experimental study. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 24, 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2017.1375733 (2018).
2. International Organization for Standardization. Ergonomics—Danger Signals for Public and Work Areas—Auditory Danger Signals. ISO 7731 (Beuth, 2008).
3. European Committee for Standardization. Safety of Machinery, Visual Danger Signals, General Requirements, Design and Testing. EN 842:1996+A1:2008 (Beuth, 2009).
4. European Committee for Standardization. Medical electrical equipment—Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance. IEC 60601-1:2005 + Cor. :2006 + Cor. :2007 + A1:2012); German version EN 60601-1:2006 + Cor. :2010 + A1:2013 (Beuth, Berlin, 2013).
5. Geng, B., Yoshida, K. & Jensen, W. Impacts of selected stimulation patterns on the perception threshold in electrocutaneous stimulation. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 8, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-8-9 (2011).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献