Abstract
AbstractNature-based solutions that use a counterfactual scenario depend heavily on the methodology used to determine the business as usual (BAU) case, i.e., the “baseline.” Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) projects traditionally set baselines using a “reference area” as a control for estimating BAU deforestation and emissions in the treatment (project) area. While the REDD+ market is shifting from project-based to nested approaches as countries increase their efforts to meet nationally determined contributions (NDCs) to the Paris agreement’s global climate target, methodologies for allocating national baselines are not yet formalized and tested, despite an urgent need to scale the market. We present a novel method for mapping deforestation risk and allocating national forest reference emission levels (FREL) to projects: baseline allocation for assessed risk (BAAR). This approach provides a spatial predictor of future deforestation using a dynamic vector, and a method for allocating a FREL to differentiated risk areas at the project level. Here, we present BAAR using 34 REDD+ projects in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). We demonstrate the importance of risk-based FREL allocations to balance fitness for purpose and scientific rigor. We show how BAAR can be used by governments to focus voluntary carbon market finance in areas at highest risk of imminent deforestation, while maintaining alignment with nationally determined contribution (NDC) goals.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference44 articles.
1. IPCC Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. In Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Lee, H. & Romero, J.) 184 (IPCC, 2023).
2. Griscom, B., Shoch, D., Stanley, B., Cortez, R. & Virgilio, N. Sensitivity of amounts and distribution of tropical forest carbon credits depending on baseline rules. Environ. Sci. Policy 12(7), 897–911 (2009).
3. Cook-Patton, S. C. et al. Protect, manage and then restore lands for climate mitigation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 1027–1034 (2021).
4. Pauly, M. & Tosteson, J. Safeguarding natural forests through the voluntary REDD+ scheme. Nat. Plants 8, 861–866 (2022).
5. Holloway, V. & Giandomenico, E. Carbon Planet white paper: The history of REDD policy. Vol. 2, 20 (Carbon Planet Limited, Adelaid, 2009).