Author:
Ferlias Nikolaos,Nielsen Henrik,Andersen Erik,Stoustrup Peter
Abstract
AbstractSafe delivery of care is a priority in dentistry, while basic epidemiological knowledge of patient safety incidents is still lacking. The objectives of this study were to (1) classify patient safety incidents related to primary dental care in Denmark in the period 2016–2020 and study the distribution of different types of dental treatment categories where harm occurred, (2) clarify treatment categories leading to "nerve injury" and "tooth loss" and (3) assess the financial cost of patient-harm claims. Data from the Danish Dental Compensation Act (DDCA) database was retrieved from all filed cases from 1st January 2016 until 31st December 2020 pertaining to: (1) The reason why the patient applied for treatment-related harm compensation, (2) the event that led to the alleged harm (treatment category), (3) the type of patient-harm, and (4) the financial cost of all harm compensations. A total of 9069 claims were retrieved, of which 5079 (56%) were found eligible for compensation. The three most frequent categories leading to compensation were "Root canal treatment and post preparation"(n = 2461, 48% of all approved claims), “lack of timely diagnosis and initiation of treatment” (n = 905, 18%) and “surgery” (n = 878, 17%). Damage to the root of the tooth accounted for more than half of all approved claims (54.36%), which was most frequently a result of either parietal perforation during endodontic treatment (18.54%) or instrument fracture (18.89%). Nerve injury accounted for 16.81% of the approved claims. Total cost of all compensation payments was €16,309,310, 41.1% of which was related to surgery (€6,707,430) and 20.4% (€3,322,927) to endodontic treatment. This comprehensive analysis documents that harm permeates all aspects of dentistry, especially in endodontics and surgery. Neglect or diagnostic delays contribute to 18% of claims, indicating that harm does not solely result from direct treatment. Treatment harm inflicts considerable societal costs.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference36 articles.
1. Pyo, J. et al. Impact of patient safety incidents reported by the general public in Korea. J. Patient Saf. 17, E964–E970 (2021).
2. Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J. M. & Donaldson, M. S. To err is human. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 52, 1–287 (2000).
3. World Health Organization (WHO). Conceptual Framework for the International Classification for Patient Safety Final Technical Report. International Classification 3–101 (2009).
4. Edwards, I. R. The WHO world alliance for patient safety. Drug Saf. 28, 379–386 (2005).
5. Assiri, G. A. et al. What is the epidemiology of medication errors, error-related adverse events and risk factors for errors in adults managed in community care contexts? A systematic review of the international literature. BMJ Open 8, e019101 (2018).