Author:
Zimmerman Blake E.,Johnson Sara L.,Odéen Henrik A.,Shea Jill E.,Factor Rachel E.,Joshi Sarang C.,Payne Allison H.
Abstract
AbstractAdvances in imaging and early cancer detection have increased interest in magnetic resonance (MR) guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) technologies for cancer treatment. MRgFUS ablation treatments could reduce surgical risks, preserve organ tissue and function, and improve patient quality of life. However, surgical resection and histological analysis remain the gold standard to assess cancer treatment response. For non-invasive ablation therapies such as MRgFUS, the treatment response must be determined through MR imaging biomarkers. However, current MR biomarkers are inconclusive and have not been rigorously evaluated against histology via accurate registration. Existing registration methods rely on anatomical features to directly register in vivo MR and histology. For MRgFUS applications in anatomies such as liver, kidney, or breast, anatomical features that are not caused by the treatment are often insufficient to drive direct registration. We present a novel MR to histology registration workflow that utilizes intermediate imaging and does not rely on anatomical MR features being visible in histology. The presented workflow yields an overall registration accuracy of 1.00 ± 0.13 mm. The developed registration pipeline is used to evaluate a common MRgFUS treatment assessment biomarker against histology. Evaluating MR biomarkers against histology using this registration pipeline will facilitate validating novel MRgFUS biomarkers to improve treatment assessment without surgical intervention. While the presented registration technique has been evaluated in a MRgFUS ablation treatment model, this technique could be potentially applied in any tissue to evaluate a variety of therapeutic options.
Funder
National Institutes of Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference37 articles.
1. McDannold, N. et al. Uterine leiomyomas: MR imaging–based thermometry and thermal dosimetry during focused ultrasound thermal ablation. Radiology, 240(1), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2401050717 (2006).
2. Tempany, CMC. et al. Focused ultrasound surgery in oncology: overview and principles. Radiology 259(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11100155 (2011).
3. Elias, J., et al. MR-guided focused ultrasound lesioning for the treatment of essential tremora–new paradigm for noninvasive lesioning and neuromodulation. Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Washington, DC, USA. Back to cited text. No. 5. 2011.
4. Rapoport, N. et al. Ultrasound-mediated tumor imaging and nanotherapy using drug loaded, block copolymer stabilized perfluorocarbon nanoemulsions. J. Control. Release 153(1), 4–15 (2011).
5. O'Reilly, M. A., Huang, Y. & Hynynen, K. The impact of standing wave effects on transcranial focused ultrasound disruption of the blood-brain barrier in a rat model. Phys Med Biol., 55(18), 5251–5267 (2010).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献