Author:
Zhu Jingyi,Du Peixin,Wang Zhenyi,Zheng De,Wang Qingming,Mei Zubing
Abstract
AbstractThe aim of this study was to introduce a new technique, the bared external anal sphincter technique, and to evaluate its effectiveness and safety for primary or recurrent high horseshoe anal fistula (HHAF). We used data from a tertiary referral hospital’s prospective database of a hospital-based cohort. All the patients underwent the bared external anal sphincter procedure. The main outcomes were short‐term clinical outcomes including the 6-month cure rate, Visual Analog Scale pain score (VAS-PS) and Cleveland Clinic Florida incontinence score (CCF-IS). The secondary outcomes included the Quality of Life in Patients with Anal Fistula Questionnaire score (QoLAF-QS), Bristol stool chart and postoperative complications. A total of 48 HHAF patients (39 males) with a mean age of 34.2 years (SD 9.04; range, 21–54) were analyzed in this retrospective study. At the 6-month follow-up, the average VAS-PS and CCF-IS were 0.81 (SD 2.28; range, 0–10) and 1.29 (SD 2.87; range, 0–13), respectively. QoLAF-QS showed that the bared external anal sphincter procedure had no impact over their quality of life in 45 patients (93.75%), limited impact in 2 patients (4.16%), and moderate impact in one patient (2.08%). The Bristol stool scale showed that all patients had normal stool characteristics. The 6-month cure rate was 93.75%. Three patients (6.25%) experienced recurrent symptoms but recovered after surgical management. Urinary retention occurred in 1 case (2.78%). No other postoperative complications were reported. No patient had anal incontinence. The bared external anal sphincter procedure is a safe, effective and sphincter-sparing approach for patients with primary or recurrent HHAF in terms of short‐term results.
Funder
the Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (Scientific Innovation Project).
the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Siming Scholars from Shuguang Hospital
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference27 articles.
1. Koehler, A., Risse-Schaaf, A. & Athanasiadis, S. Treatment for horseshoe fistulas-in-ano with primary closure of the internal fistula opening: A clinical and manometric study. Dis. Colon Rectum. 47(11), 1874–1882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0650-8 (2004).
2. De Parades, V. et al. Horseshoe tract of anal fistula: Bad luck or an avoidable extension? Lessons from 82 cases. Colorectal Dis. 14(12), 1512–1515. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03034.x (2012).
3. Li, J., Yang, W. & Huang, Z. Clinical characteristics and risk factors for recurrence of anal fistula patients. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 19(12), 1370–1374 (2016).
4. Abbas, M. A. Predictors of outcome for anal fistula surgery. Arch. Surg. 146(9), 1011. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2011.197 (2011).
5. Narang, S. K. et al. A systematic review of new treatments for cryptoglandular fistula in ano. The Surgeon. 15(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2016.02.002 (2017).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献