Author:
Kaetzl Korbinian,Lübken Manfred,Nettmann Edith,Krimmler Stefan,Wichern Marc
Abstract
AbstractThe efficiency of anaerobic biofilters (AnBF) as low-cost wastewater treatment systems was investigated. Miscanthus-biochar was used as filtration media and compared with sand as a common reference material. Raw sewage from a municipal wastewater treatment plant was stored in a sedimentation tank for two days to allow pre-settlement of wastewater particles. Subsequently, wastewater was treated by AnBFs at 22 °C room temperature at a hydraulic loading rate of 0.05 m∙h−1 with an empty bed contact time of 14.4 h and a mean organic loading rate of 509 ± 173 gCOD∙m−3∙d−1. Mean removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD) of biochar filters was with 74 ± 18% significantly higher than of sand filters (61 ± 12%). In contrast to sand filters with a mean reduction of 1.18 ± 0.31 log-units, E. coli removal through biochar was with 1.35 ± 0.27 log-units significantly higher and increased with experimental time. Main removal took place within the schmutzdecke, a biologically active dirt layer that develops simultaneously on the surface of filter beds. Since the E. coli contamination of both filter materials was equal, the higher removal efficiency of biochar filters is probably a result of an improved biodegradation within deeper zones of the filter bed. Overall, performance of biochar filters was better or equal compared to sand and have thus demonstrated the suitability of Miscanthus-biochar as filter media for wastewater treatment.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Germany
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference51 articles.
1. Steduto, P., Faurès, J.-M., Hoogeveen, J., Winpenny, J. & Burke, J. Coping with water scarcity: An action framework for agriculture and food security. FAO Water Rep. 38, 1–79 (2012).
2. Sato, T., Qadir, M., Yamamoto, S., Endo, T. & Zahoor, A. Global, regional, and country level need for data on wastewater generation, treatment, and use. Agric. Water Manag. 130, 1–13 (2013).
3. Qadir, M. et al. The challenges of wastewater irrigation in developing countries. Agric. Water Manag. 97, 561–568 (2010).
4. Amy, G. et al. Integrated comparison of biofiltration in engineered versus natural systems. In: Gimble, R. Graham, N.J.D., Collins, M.R.Recent Progress in Slow Sand and Alternative Biofiltration Processes. IWA Publishing 4, (IWA Publishing, 2006).
5. Drechsel, P. et al. Reducing health risks from wastewater use in urban and peri-urban sub-Saharan Africa: applying the 2006 WHO guidelines. Water Sci. Technol. 57, 1461–6 (2008).
Cited by
69 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献