Author:
Pipita Maria Elena,Santonico Marco,Pennazza Giorgio,Zompanti Alessandro,Fazzina Sara,Cavalieri Danilo,Bruno Francesca,Angeletti Silvia,Pedone Claudio,Incalzi Raffaele Antonelli
Abstract
AbstractPleural effusion is very common, but an etiologic diagnosis is often difficult. We used three unconventional diagnostic techniques (voltammetric analysis, protein electrophoresis and pH measurement) performed on pleural effusion to do a preliminary distinction between a neoplastic and a non-neoplastic origin. Pleural fluid samples were collected through thoracentesis, thoracoscopy, or post-surgery pleural drainage of 116 patients admitted to acute care wards. Samples were analyzed with the three unconventional techniques: voltammetric analysis using the BIONOTE system, capillary electrophoresis and pH measurement using a potentiometric method. The BIONOTE system is an innovative system that performs a cyclic voltammetric analysis of a biological liquid sample. The final output of the electrochemical analysis is an electrical pattern that represents a fingerprint of the analyzed sample and each sample has a different fingerprint. Data from the three unconventional diagnostic techniques were analyzed using partial least squares discriminant analysis to discriminate neoplastic from non-neoplastic effusions; we also evaluated sensitivity, specificity and percentage of correct classification. The mean age was 68 years (SD: 12); 78 (67.24%) participants were men. Results obtained from all the unconventional techniques employed showed that neoplastic and non-neoplastic pleural effusions were correctly classified in 80.2% of cases, with a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 83%. The combined use of voltammetric analysis, protein electrophoresis and pH measurement of pleural fluid can easily and quickly distinguish a neoplastic from a non-neoplastic pleural effusion with reliable accuracy and represents an innovative diagnostic approach. In fact, this protocol can be executed in just few minutes directly in the patient's bed and it holds great promise to improve the prognosis and therapeutic chances.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference23 articles.
1. Owings, M. F. & Kozak, L. J. Ambulatory and inpatient procedures in the United States, 1996. Vital Health Stat. 13(139), 1–119 (1998).
2. Light, R. W. Clinical practice. Pleural effusion. N. Engl. J. Med. 346(25), 1971–1977 (2002).
3. Heffner, J. E., Brown, L. K. & Barbieri, C. A. Diagnostic value of tests that discriminate between exudative and transudative pleural effusions. Primary study investigatiors. Chest 111(4), 970–980 (1997).
4. Santonico, M., Pennazza, G., Grasso, S., D’Amico, A. & Bizzarri, M. Design and test of a biosensor- based multisensorial system: a proof of concept study. Sensors 13(12), 16625–16640 (2013).
5. Filik, H., Avan, A. & Aydar, S. Voltammetric sensing of uremic toxin indoxyl sulfate using high performance disposable screen-printed graphene electrode. Curr. Pharm. Anal. 12(1), 36–42 (2015).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献