Author:
Samare Hashemi Syed Mohsen,Robati Amir,Kazerooni Mohammad Ali
Abstract
AbstractThe optimal operation of the multi-purpose reservoir system is a difficult, and, sometimes, non-linear problem in multi-objective optimization. By simulating biological behavior, meta-heuristic algorithms scan the decision space and can offer a set of points as a group of solutions to a problem. Because it is essential to simultaneously optimize several competing objectives and consider relevant constraints as the main problem in many optimization problems, researchers have improved their ability to solve multi-objective problems by developing complementary multi-objective algorithms. Because the AHA algorithm is new, its multi-objective version, MOAHA (multi-objective artificial hummingbird algorithm), was used in this study and compared with two novel multi-objective algorithms, MOMSA and MOMGA. Schaffer and MMF1 were used as two standard multi-objective benchmark functions to gauge the effectiveness of the proposed method. Then, for 180 months, the best way to operate the reservoir system of the Karun River basin, which includes Karun 4, Karun 3, Karun 1, Masjed-e-Soleyman, and Gotvand Olia dams to generate hydropower energy, supply downstream demands (drinking, agriculture, industry, environmental), and control flooding was examined from September 2000 to August 2015. Four performance appraisal criteria (GD, S, Δ, and MS) and four evaluation indices (reliability, resiliency, vulnerability, and sustainability) were used in Karun's multi-objective multi-reservoir problem to evaluate the performance of the multi-objective algorithm. All three algorithms demonstrated strong capability in criterion problems by using multi-objective algorithms’ criteria and performance indicators. The large-scale (1800 dimensions) of the multi-objective operation of the Karun Basin reservoir system was another problem. With a minimum of 1441.71 objectives and an average annual hydropower energy manufacturing of 17,166.47 GW, the MOAHA algorithm demonstrated considerable ability compared to the other two. The final results demonstrated the MOAHA algorithm’s excellent performance, particularly in difficult and significant problems such as multi-reservoir systems' optimal operation under various objectives.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference55 articles.
1. Nandalal, K. D. W. & Sakthivadivel, R. Planning and management of a complex water resource system: Case of Samanalawewa and Udawalawe reservoirs in the Walawe river, Sri Lanka. Agric. Water Manag. 57(3), 207–221 (2002).
2. Chen, L., McPhee, J. & Yeh, W. W. G. A diversified multiobjective GA for optimizing reservoir rule curves. Adv. Water Resour. 30(5), 1082–1093 (2007).
3. Holland, J. H. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems (The University of Michigan Press, 1975).
4. East, V. Water resources system optimization using genetic algorithms. In Hydroinformatics’ 94, Proceedings, 1st International Conference on Hydroinformatics, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (1994).
5. Oliveira, R. & Loucks, D. P. Operating rules for multireservoir systems. Water Resour. Res. 33(4), 839–852 (1997).