Author:
Jahn Laura R.,Marquet Céline,Heinzinger Michael,Rost Burkhard
Abstract
AbstractThe identification of protein binding residues helps to understand their biological processes as protein function is often defined through ligand binding, such as to other proteins, small molecules, ions, or nucleotides. Methods predicting binding residues often err for intrinsically disordered proteins or regions (IDPs/IDPRs), often also referred to as molecular recognition features (MoRFs). Here, we presented a novel machine learning (ML) model trained to specifically predict binding regions in IDPRs. The proposed model, IDBindT5, leveraged embeddings from the protein language model (pLM) ProtT5 to reach a balanced accuracy of 57.2 ± 3.6% (95% confidence interval). Assessed on the same data set, this did not differ at the 95% CI from the state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods ANCHOR2 and DeepDISOBind that rely on expert-crafted features and evolutionary information from multiple sequence alignments (MSAs). Assessed on other data, methods such as SPOT-MoRF reached higher MCCs. IDBindT5’s SOTA predictions are much faster than other methods, easily enabling full-proteome analyses. Our findings emphasize the potential of pLMs as a promising approach for exploring and predicting features of disordered proteins. The model and a comprehensive manual are publicly available at https://github.com/jahnl/binding_in_disorder.
Funder
Bavarian Ministry of Education through TUM
Alexander von Humboldt foundation through the German Ministry for Research and Education
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Technische Universität München
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference56 articles.
1. Dunker, A. K. et al. What’s in a name? Why these proteins are intrinsically disordered. Intrinsically Disord. Proteins 1, e24157 (2013).
2. Liu, J., Tan, H. & Rost, B. Loopy proteins appear conserved in evolution. J. Mol. Biol. 322, 53–64 (2002).
3. DeForte, S. & Uversky, V. N. Order, disorder, and everything in between. Molecules https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21081090 (2016).
4. Dunker, A. K. et al. Protein disorder and the evolution of molecular recognition: Theory, predictions and observations. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 3, 473–484 (1998).
5. Tompa, P. et al. Close encounters of the third kind: Disordered domains and the interactions of proteins. Bioessays 31, 328–335. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.200800151 (2009).