Author:
Prop Jouke,Black Jeffrey M.,Aars Jon,Oudman Thomas,Wolters Eva,Moe Børge
Abstract
AbstractAccording to sexual selection theory, the sexes are faced with opposing evolutionary goals. Male fitness benefits from access to females, whereas female fitness is constrained by food resources and safety for themselves and their offspring. Particularly in large solitary carnivores, such as polar bears (Ursus maritimus), these divergent goals can potentially lead to conflict between the sexes. Outside the mating season, when polar bears are on the move across vast distances, the consequences of such conflict can become apparent when individuals arrive at the same food source. To investigate interrelationships between the sexes, we observed successive polar bears visiting a bird breeding colony to feed on clutches of eggs. We found that males succeeded females more frequently and more closely than expected by chance. Moreover, when males were closer to conspecifics, they walked faster, spent less time in the colony and ingested less food. In contrast, female foraging performance was not associated with proximity to other bears. Irrespective of proximity, females generally spent short periods in the colony and ingested fewer clutches than males. Our results suggest that in polar bears, there is a trade-off between the benefits of food intake and the opportunities (in males) and risks (in females) posed by encountering conspecifics.
Funder
INNO-fund
Willem Barentsz Foundation
Fram Centre programme Catchment-to-Coast
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference113 articles.
1. Vehrencamp, S. L. & Bradbury, J. W. Mating systems and ecology. In Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach Vol. 2 (eds Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B.) 251–278 (Blackwell Scientific Publications Oxford, 1984).
2. Davies, N. B. Mating system. In Behavioural ecology-an evolutionary approach (eds Davies, N. B. & Krebs, J. R.) 263–294 (Blackwell, 1991).
3. Dammhahn, M. & Kappeler, P. M. Females go where the food is: Does the socio-ecological model explain variation in social organisation of solitary foragers?. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 63, 939–952 (2009).
4. Cassini, M. H. Sexual aggression in mammals. Mammal Rev. 51, 247–255 (2021).
5. Amstrup, S. C., Stirling, I., Smith, T. S., Perham, C. & Thiemann, G. W. Recent observations of intraspecific predation and cannibalism among polar bears in the southern Beaufort Sea. Polar Biol. 29, 997–1002 (2006).