Author:
Li Mingyang,Wu Xiongjun,Xie Weijie,Zeng Yu,Wang Hui,Chen Han,Xu Anping,Liu Helu,Ji Ling
Abstract
AbstractHemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) plays a crucial role in diabetes management. We aimed to evaluate the analytical performance of a new enzymatic method kit for HbA1c measurement. The performance of the enzymatic method, including precision, accuracy, and linearity, was evaluated. Moreover, the interference effect from conventional interferents, Hb derivatives, Hb variants, and common drugs were assessed. In addition, the agreement of HbA1c results was compared between enzymatic methods, cation-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and immunoassays. The intra-assay, between-assay, and total precision of HbA1c were all lower than 2%. HbA1c showed good linearity within the range of 3.96–20.23%. The enzymatic assay yielded results consistent with the external quality control samples, with a bias of less than ± 6% from the target values. The enzymatic method showed no interference from bilirubin, intralipid, vitamin C, Hb derivatives, common Hb variants, as well as antipyretic analgesics and hypoglycemic drugs. The HbA1c results of the enzymatic assay showed good agreement and accuracy compared to those obtained from the HPLC method and the immunoassay. The enzymatic method kit performed on the BS-600M chemistry analyzer is a reliable and robust method for measuring HbA1c. It is suitable for routine practice in clinical chemistry laboratories.
Funder
Medical Science and Technology Foundation of Guangdong Province
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference17 articles.
1. Braga, F., Dolci, A., Mosca, A. & Panteghini, M. Biological variability of glycated hemoglobin. Chim. Clin. Acta 411, 1606–1610 (2010).
2. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N. Engl. J. Med. 329, 977–986 (1993).
3. U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive bloodglucose control with sulphonyl ureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998(352), 837–853 (1998).
4. Sacks, D. B. et al. Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 34(6), e61-99 (2011).
5. Gillett, M. J. International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1c assay in the diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 32, 1327–1334 (2009).