Author:
Sanmugasiva Vithya Visalatchi,Ramli Hamid Marlina Tanty,Fadzli Farhana,Rozalli Faizatul Izza,Yeong Chai Hong,Ab Mumin Nazimah,Rahmat Kartini
Abstract
AbstractThis study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis in combination with full field digital mammography (DBT + FFDM) in the charaterisation of Breast Imaging-reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 3, 4 and 5 lesions. Retrospective cross-sectional study of 390 patients with BI-RADS 3, 4 and 5 mammography with available histopathology examination results were recruited from in a single center of a multi-ethnic Asian population. 2 readers independently reported the FFDM and DBT images and classified lesions detected (mass, calcifications, asymmetric density and architectural distortion) based on American College of Radiology-BI-RADS lexicon. Of the 390 patients recruited, 182 malignancies were reported. Positive predictive value (PPV) of cancer was 46.7%. The PPV in BI-RADS 4a, 4b, 4c and 5 were 6.0%, 38.3%, 68.9%, and 93.1%, respectively. Among all the cancers, 76% presented as masses, 4% as calcifications and 20% as asymmetry. An additional of 4% of cancers were detected on ultrasound. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of mass lesions detected on DBT + FFDM were 93.8%, 85.1%, 88.8% and 91.5%, respectively. The PPV for calcification is 61.6% and asymmetry is 60.7%. 81.6% of cancer detected were invasive and 13.3% were in-situ type. Our study showed that DBT is proven to be an effective tool in the diagnosis and characterization of breast lesions and supports the current body of literature that states that integrating DBT to FFDM allows good characterization of breast lesions and accurate diagnosis of cancer.
Funder
UM Postgraduate Research Grant
Malaysian Ministry of Education
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. Breast Cancer Statistics. https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer/cancer-trends/breast-cancer-statistics (accessed 14 January 2020).
2. Breast Cancer Facts and Figures. http://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/breast-cancer-facts-and-figures/breast-cancer-facts-and-figures-2017-2018.pdf (accessed 14 January 2020).
3. Friedewald, S. M., Rafferty, E. A. & Conant, E. F. Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis and digital mammography-reply. JAMA 312, 1695–1696. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.11123 (2014).
4. Castronovo, V. & Bellahcene, A. Evidence that breast cancer associated microcalcifications are mineralized malignant cells. Int. J. Oncol. 12, 305–313 (1998).
5. Morgan, M. P., Cooke, M. M. & McCarthy, G. M. Microcalcifications associated with breast cancer: an epiphenomenon or biologically significant feature of selected tumors?. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 10, 181–187 (2005).
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献