Abstract
AbstractMemory compensation strategies serve an important role in everyday functioning, especially in the face of cognitive decline. Research on the external memory compensation strategies employed by older adults has focused almost entirely on non-digital tools. Less is known about how memory compensation strategies might have changed due to the rapid and widespread uptake of digital technologies. In the current research, 208 younger adults and 114 older adults freely reported what internal or external memory strategy or tool they would use to accomplish 20 different everyday memory tasks. Participants’ responses were coded as involving either internal (e.g. using a mnemonic) or external (e.g. writing a list) strategies, and then underwent further categorisation to classify types of internal and external strategies (e.g. digital or physical tool). Findings indicated that external strategies were much more prevalent than internal strategies for both younger and older adults, and that digital compensation strategies were prevalent for both age groups. There were age differences such that older adults reported more strategies overall, and were less likely to report digital tools, more likely to report physical tools, more likely to report environmental tools, and less likely to report social tools than younger adults. Positive attitudes to technology were associated with digital tool use for older but not younger participants. Findings are discussed in terms of existing theories and approaches to studying memory compensation strategies and cognitive offloading.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference23 articles.
1. Bäckman, L. & Dixon, R. A. Psychological compensation: A theoretical framework. Psychol. Bull. 112, 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.259 (1992).
2. de Frias, C. M., Dixon, R. A. & Bäckman, L. Use of memory compensation strategies is related to psychosocial and health indicators. J. Gerontol. B 58, P12–P22. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/58.1.P12 (2003).
3. Dixon, R. A., de Frias, C. M. & Bäckman, L. Characteristics of self-reported memory compensation in older adults. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 23, 650–661. https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.23.5.650.1242 (2001).
4. Dixon, R. A. & Bäckman, L. Compensating for Psychological Deficits and Declines: Managing Losses and Promoting Gains (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, 1995).
5. Cabeza, R. et al. Maintenance, reserve and compensation: The cognitive neuroscience of healthy ageing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 19, 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-018-0068-2 (2018).
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献