Author:
Pereira Luiz Miguel,Portapilla Gisele Bulhões,Brancini Guilherme Thomaz Pereira,Possato Bruna,Bronzon da Costa Cássia Mariana,Abreu-Filho Péricles Gama,Wainwright Mark,Yatsuda Ana Patrícia,Braga Gilberto Úbida Leite
Abstract
AbstractAssessing the in vitro toxicity of compounds on cell cultures is an important step during the screening of candidate molecules for diverse applications. Among the strategies employed to determine cytotoxicity, MTT, neutral red, and resazurin are commonly used. Methylene blue (MB), a phenothiazinium salt, has several uses, such as dye, redox indicator, and even as treatment for human disease and health conditions, such as malaria and methemoglobinemia. However, MB has only been sparsely used as a cellular toxicity indicator. As a viability indicator, MB is mostly applied to fixed cultures at high concentrations, especially when compared to MTT or neutral red. Here we show that MB and its related compounds new methylene blue (NMB), toluidine blue O (TBO), and dimethylmethylene blue (DMMB) can be used as cytotoxicity indicators in live (non-fixed) cells treated for 72 h with DMSO and cisplatin. We compared dye uptake between phenothiazinium dyes and neutral red by analyzing supernatant and cell content via visible spectra scanning and microscopy. All dyes showed a similar ability to assess cell toxicity compared to either MTT or neutral red. Our method represents a cost-effective alternative to in vitro cytotoxicity assays using cisplatin or DMSO, indicating the potential of phenothiazinium dyes for the screening of candidate drugs and other applications.
Funder
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference72 articles.
1. Aslantürk, Ö. S. In vitro cytotoxicity and cell viability assays: Principles, advantages, and disadvantages. In Genotoxicity—A Predictable Risk to Our Actual World (eds Marcelo, L. L. & Sonia, S.) (IntechOpen, 2018).
2. Fotakis, G. & Timbrell, J. A. In vitro cytotoxicity assays: Comparison of LDH, neutral red, MTT and protein assay in hepatoma cell lines following exposure to cadmium chloride. Toxicol. Lett. 160, 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2005.07.001 (2006).
3. Śliwka, L. et al. The comparison of MTT and CVS assays for the assessment of anticancer agent interactions. PLoS ONE 11, e0155772. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155772 (2016).
4. Dengler, W. A., Schulte, J., Berger, D. P., Mertelsmann, R. & Fiebig, H. H. Development of a propidium iodide fluorescence assay for proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. Anticancer Drugs 6, 522–532. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001813-199508000-00005 (1995).
5. Kim, S. I. et al. Application of a non-hazardous vital dye for cell counting with automated cell counters. Anal. Biochem. 492, 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2015.09.010 (2016).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献