The neural mechanism of communication between graduate students and advisers in different adviser-advisee relationships-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The neural mechanism of communication between graduate students and advisers in different adviser-advisee relationships

Published:2024-05-23 Issue:1 Volume:14 Page:
ISSN:2045-2322
Container-title:Scientific Reports
language:en
Short-container-title:Sci Rep

Author:

Zhang Yan,Wu Peipei,Xie Simiao,Hou Yan,Wu Huifen,Shi Hui

Abstract

AbstractCommunication is crucial in constructing the relationship between students and advisers, ultimately bridging interpersonal interactions. Only a few studies however explore the communication between postgraduate students and advisers. To fill the gaps in the empirical researches, this study uses functional near-infrared spectroscopy (FNIRS) techniques to explore the neurophysiology differences in brain activation of postgraduates with different adviser-advise relationships during simulated communication with their advisers. Results showed significant differences in the activation of the prefrontal cortex between high-quality and the low-quality students during simulating and when communicating with advisers, specifically in the Broca's areas, the frontal pole, and the orbitofrontal and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices. This further elucidated the complex cognitive process of communication between graduate students and advisers.

Funder

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, HUST

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Link

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-58308-z.pdf

Reference84 articles.

1. Schlosser, L. Z., Lyons, H. Z., Talleyrand, R. M., Kim, B. S. & Johnson, W. B. Advisor-advisee relationships in graduate training programs. J. Career Dev. 38(1), 3–18 (2011).

2. Morpurgo, J. S. A study of the role expectations of advisers and advisees and expected outcomes of the adviser-advisee relationship (University of Illinois, 1975).

3. Nadler, L. B. & Nadler, M. K. Faculty and student expectations/perceptions of the adviser-advisee relationship. J. Assoc. Commun. Adm. 28(2), 1 (1999).

4. Wu, L. X. & Xu, S. X. Analysis on the construction of graduate student guidance relationship from the perspective of harmony. Res. Ideol. Educ. 05, 72–74 (2014) (in Chinese).

5. Liu, Z. What is the problem of the relationship between graduate tutors and students: An analysis based on in-depth interviews. Educ. Res. 09, 104–116 (2020).