Author:
Carnahan A. M.,Pagano A. M.,Christian A. L.,Rode K. D.,Robbins Charles T.
Abstract
AbstractThe diets of the eight species of ursids range from carnivory (e.g., polar bears, Ursus maritimus) to insectivory (e.g., sloth bears, Melursus ursinus), omnivory (e.g., brown bears, U. arctos), and herbivory (e.g., giant pandas, Ailuropoda melanoleuca). Dietary energy availability ranges from the high-fat, highly digestible, calorically dense diet of polar bears (~ 6.4 kcal digestible energy/g fresh weight) to the high-fiber, poorly digestible, calorically restricted diet (~ 0.7) of giant pandas. Thus, ursids provide the opportunity to examine the extent to which dietary energy drives evolution of energy metabolism in a closely related group of animals. We measured the daily energy expenditure (DEE) of captive brown bears in a relatively large, zoo-type enclosure and compared those values to previously published results on captive brown bears, captive and free-ranging polar bears, and captive and free-ranging giant pandas. We found that all three species have similar mass-specific DEE when travel distances and energy intake are normalized even though their diets differ dramatically and phylogenetic lineages are separated by millions of years. For giant pandas, the ability to engage in low-cost stationary foraging relative to more wide-ranging bears likely provided the necessary energy savings to become bamboo specialists without greatly altering their metabolic rate.
Funder
U.S. Geological Survey
Bear Research and Conservation Endowment at Washington State University
National Science Foundation Office of Polar Programs
USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Interagency Grizzly Bear Committee
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Mazuri Exotic Animal Nutrition
Raili Korkka Brown Bear Endowment
Nutritional Ecology Endowment
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference49 articles.
1. Speakman, J. R. Doubly labelled water: theory and practice. (Chapman and Hall, 1997).
2. Nagy, K. A. CO2 production in animals: analysis of potential errors in the doubly labeled water method. Am. J. Physiol. 238, R466–R473 (1980).
3. McNab, B. K. Behavioral and ecological factors account for variation in the mass-independent energy expenditures of endotherms. J. Comp. Physiol. B 185, 1–13 (2015).
4. Nie, Y. et al. Exceptionally low daily energy expenditure in the bamboo-eating giant panda. Science 349, 171–174 (2015).
5. Fei, Y. et al. Metabolic rates of giant pandas inform conservation strategies. Sci. Rep. 6, 27248 (2016).