Author:
Choi Eunhye,Lee Soohong,Jeong Eunjae,Shin Seokwon,Park Hyunwoo,Youm Sekyoung,Son Youngdoo,Pang KangMi
Abstract
AbstractDetermining the exact positional relationship between mandibular third molar (M3) and inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) is important for surgical extractions. Panoramic radiography is the most common dental imaging test. The purposes of this study were to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model to determine two positional relationships (true contact and bucco-lingual position) between M3 and IAN when they were overlapped in panoramic radiographs and compare its performance with that of oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) specialists. A total of 571 panoramic images of M3 from 394 patients was used for this study. Among the images, 202 were classified as true contact, 246 as intimate, 61 as IAN buccal position, and 62 as IAN lingual position. A deep convolutional neural network model with ResNet-50 architecture was trained for each task. We randomly split the dataset into 75% for training and validation and 25% for testing. Model performance was superior in bucco-lingual position determination (accuracy 0.76, precision 0.83, recall 0.67, and F1 score 0.73) to true contact position determination (accuracy 0.63, precision 0.62, recall 0.63, and F1 score 0.61). AI exhibited much higher accuracy in both position determinations compared to OMFS specialists. In determining true contact position, OMFS specialists demonstrated an accuracy of 52.68% to 69.64%, while the AI showed an accuracy of 72.32%. In determining bucco-lingual position, OMFS specialists showed an accuracy of 32.26% to 48.39%, and the AI showed an accuracy of 80.65%. Moreover, Cohen’s kappa exhibited a substantial level of agreement for the AI (0.61) and poor agreements for OMFS specialists in bucco-lingual position determination. Determining the position relationship between M3 and IAN is possible using AI, especially in bucco-lingual positioning. The model could be used to support clinicians in the decision-making process for M3 treatment.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference35 articles.
1. Szalma, J., Lempel, E., Jeges, S., Szabo, G. & Olasz, L. The prognostic value of panoramic radiography of inferior alveolar nerve damage after mandibular third molar removal: Retrospective study of 400 cases. Oral Surg. 109, 294–302 (2010).
2. Wang, D. et al. Radiographic features of anatomic relationship between impacted third molar and inferior alveolar canal on coronal cbct images: Risk factors for nerve injury after tooth extraction. Arch. Med. Sci. 14, 532–540 (2018).
3. Datta, S. et al. Correlation of panoramic radiological and intra-operative findings of impacted mandibular 3rd molar in relation to inferior alveolar canal: A prospective study. J. Maxillofac. Oral. Surg. 1, 1–7 (2020).
4. Fukuda, M. et al. Comparison of 3 deep learning neural networks for classifying the relationship between the mandibular third molar and the mandibular canal on panoramic radiographs. Oral Surg. 130, 336–343 (2020).
5. Bell, G. W. Use of dental panoramic tomographs to predict the relation between mandibular third molar teeth and the inferior alveolar nerve. Br. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 42, 21–27 (2004).
Cited by
31 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献