Author:
Bone Nathaniel B.,Becker Eugene J.,Husain Maroof,Jiang Shaoning,Zmijewska Anna A.,Park Dae-Won,Chacko Balu,Darley-Usmar Victor,Grégoire Murielle,Tadie Jean-Marc,Thannickal Victor J.,Zmijewski Jaroslaw W.
Abstract
AbstractMetabolic and bioenergetic plasticity of immune cells is essential for optimal responses to bacterial infections. AMPK and Parkin ubiquitin ligase are known to regulate mitochondrial quality control mitophagy that prevents unwanted inflammatory responses. However, it is not known if this evolutionarily conserved mechanism has been coopted by the host immune defense to eradicate bacterial pathogens and influence post-sepsis immunosuppression. Parkin, AMPK levels, and the effects of AMPK activators were investigated in human leukocytes from sepsis survivors as well as wild type and Park2−/− murine macrophages. In vivo, the impact of AMPK and Parkin was determined in mice subjected to polymicrobial intra-abdominal sepsis and secondary lung bacterial infections. Mice were treated with metformin during established immunosuppression. We showed that bacteria and mitochondria share mechanisms of autophagic killing/clearance triggered by sentinel events that involve depolarization of mitochondria and recruitment of Parkin in macrophages. Parkin-deficient mice/macrophages fail to form phagolysosomes and kill bacteria. This impairment of host defense is seen in the context of sepsis-induced immunosuppression with decreased levels of Parkin. AMPK activators, including metformin, stimulate Parkin-independent autophagy and bacterial killing in leukocytes from post-shock patients and in lungs of sepsis-immunosuppressed mice. Our results support a dual role of Parkin and AMPK in the clearance of dysfunctional mitochondria and killing of pathogenic bacteria, and explain the immunosuppressive phenotype associated Parkin and AMPK deficiency. AMPK activation appeared to be a crucial therapeutic target for the macrophage immunosuppressive phenotype and to reduce severity of secondary bacterial lung infections and respiratory failure.
Funder
Nathan Shock Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States
National Institutes of Health
U.S. Department of Defense
PACCM, University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference65 articles.
1. Hotchkiss, R. S. et al. Sepsis and septic shock. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2, 16045 (2016).
2. Angus, D. C. & van der Poll, T. Severe sepsis and septic shock. N. Engl. J. Med. 369(21), 2063 (2013).
3. Singer, M. et al. The Third International Consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 315(8), 801–810 (2016).
4. Evans, T. Diagnosis and management of sepsis. Clin. Med. (Lond.) 18(2), 146–149 (2018).
5. Deutschman, C. S. & Tracey, K. J. Sepsis: Current dogma and new perspectives. Immunity 40(4), 463–475 (2014).
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献