Author:
Liu Hui,Zhang Bingjie,Zhu Yu,Yang Hanxiao,Zhao Bo
Abstract
AbstractQuantum computing has already demonstrated great computational potential across multiple domains and has received more and more attention. However, due to the connectivity limitations of Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices, most of the quantum algorithms cannot be directly executed without the help of inserting SWAP gates. Nevertheless, more SWAP gates lead to a longer execution time and, inevitably, lower fidelity of the algorithm. To this end, this paper proposes an optimized qubit mapping algorithm based on a dynamic look-ahead strategy to minimize the number of SWAP gates inserted. Firstly, a heuristic algorithm is proposed based on maximizing physical qubit connectivity to generate the optimal initial qubit mapping, which reduces the need for logical qubit shifts during subsequent SWAP gate insertion. Secondly, in the form of directed acyclic graphs, we identify quantum gates that violate the constraints of physical coupling and insert SWAP gates to remap qubits, thereby overcoming the limitations of qubit interactions. Finally, the optimal SWAP gate insertion strategy is built by comparing the cost of different SWAP gate insertion strategies through a multi-window look-ahead strategy to reduce the number of SWAP gates inserted. The experimental results show that the strategy in this paper decreases the number of SWAP gate insertions and significantly reduces the depth of quantum circuits when performing qubit mapping compared with state-of-the-art methods.
Funder
Major Science and Technology Projects in Henan Province, China
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference29 articles.
1. Balynsky, M. et al. Quantum computing without quantum computers: Database search and data processing using classical wave superposition. J. Appl. Phys. 130, 164903 (2021).
2. Cao, Y. et al. Quantum chemistry in the age of quantum computing. Chem. Rev. 119, 10856–10915 (2019).
3. Paler, A., Lucian, S., Adrian-Cătălin, F. & Răzvan, A. Machine learning optimization of quantum circuit layouts. ACM Trans. Quantum Comput. 4, 1–25 (2023).
4. Khan, M. T. & Robles-Kelly, A. Machine learning: Quantum vs classical. IEEE Access 8, 219275–219294 (2020).
5. Wang, Y., Chen, Y., Amad, H. & Wei, Z. Message authentication with a new quantum hash function. Comput. Mater. Contin. 59, 635–648 (2019).