Author:
Rahimi Elham,Shekarian Younes,Shekarian Naser,Roghanchi Pedram
Abstract
AbstractDust is an inherent byproduct of mining activities that raises notable health and safety concerns. Cumulative inhalation of respirable coal mine dust (RCMD) and respirable crystalline silica (RCS) can lead to obstructive lung diseases. Despite considerable efforts to reduce dust exposure by decreasing the permissible exposure limits (PEL) and improving the monitoring techniques, the rate of mine workers with respiratory diseases is still high. The root causes of the high prevalence of respiratory diseases remain unknown. This study aimed to investigate contributing factors in RCMD and RCS dust concentrations in both surface and underground mines. To this end, a data management approach is performed on MSHA’s database between 1989 and 2018 using SQL data management. In this process, all data were grouped by mine ID, and then, categories of interests were defined to conduct statistical analysis using the generalized estimating equation (GEE) model. The total number of 12,537 and 9050 observations for respirable dust concentration are included, respectively, in the U.S. underground and surface mines. Several variables were defined in four categories of interest including mine type, geographic location, mine size, and coal seam height. Hypotheses were developed for each category based on the research model and were tested using multiple linear regression analysis. The results of the analysis indicate higher RCMD concentration in underground compared to RCS concentration which is found to be relatively higher in surface coal mines. In addition, RCMD concentration is seen to be higher in the Interior region while RCS is higher in the Appalachia region. Moreover, mines of small sizes show lower RCMD and higher RCS concentrations. Finally, thin-seam coal has greater RCMD and RCS concentrations compared to thicker seams in both underground and surface mines. In the end, it is demonstrated that RCMD and RCS concentrations in both surface and underground mines have decreased. Therefore, further research is needed to investigate the efficacy of the current mass-concentration-based monitoring system.
Funder
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference62 articles.
1. World Health Organization (WHO). (1999). Hazard Prevention and Control in the Work Environment: Airborne Dust. Occupational and Environmental Health, Department of the Protection of the Human Environment, Geneva, WHO/SDE/OEH/99.14.
2. Colinet, J.F., Rider, J.P., Listak, J.M., Organiscak, J.A., Wolfe, AL. Best Practices for Dust Control in Coal Mining. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/works/coversheet861.html (Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Office of Mine Safety and Health Research, 2010).
3. Brondy, J. & Tutak, M. Exposure to harmful dusts on fully powered longwall coal mines in Poland. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15, 1846. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091846 (2018).
4. Laney, A. S. & Weissman, D. N. Respiratory diseases caused by coal mine dust. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 56(010), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000260 (2014).
5. Beer, C. et al. A systematic review of occupational exposure to coal dust and the risk of interstitial lung diseases. Eur. Clin. Respir. J. 4, 1264711 (2017).
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献