Author:
Oswald Willaim,Browning Craig,Yasmin Ruthba,Deal Joshua,Rich Thomas C.,Leavesley Silas J.,Gong Na
Abstract
AbstractColorectal cancer is one of the top contributors to cancer-related deaths in the United States, with over 100,000 estimated cases in 2020 and over 50,000 deaths. The most common screening technique is minimally invasive colonoscopy using either reflected white light endoscopy or narrow-band imaging. However, current imaging modalities have only moderate sensitivity and specificity for lesion detection. We have developed a novel fluorescence excitation-scanning hyperspectral imaging (HSI) approach to sample image and spectroscopic data simultaneously on microscope and endoscope platforms for enhanced diagnostic potential. Unfortunately, fluorescence excitation-scanning HSI datasets pose major challenges for data processing, interpretability, and classification due to their high dimensionality. Here, we present an end-to-end scalable Artificial Intelligence (AI) framework built for classification of excitation-scanning HSI microscopy data that provides accurate image classification and interpretability of the AI decision-making process. The developed AI framework is able to perform real-time HSI classification with different speed/classification performance trade-offs by tailoring the dimensionality of the dataset, supporting different dimensions of deep learning models, and varying the architecture of deep learning models. We have also incorporated tools to visualize the exact location of the lesion detected by the AI decision-making process and to provide heatmap-based pixel-by-pixel interpretability. In addition, our deep learning framework provides wavelength-dependent impact as a heatmap, which allows visualization of the contributions of HSI wavelength bands during the AI decision-making process. This framework is well-suited for HSI microscope and endoscope platforms, where real-time analysis and visualization of classification results are required by clinicians.
Funder
NSF
Alabama EPSCoR Graduate Research Fellowship
NIH
Alabama Space Grant Consortium
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. American Cancer Society. Colorectal Cancer Facts & Figures 2020–2022 (2022).
2. Higurashi, T. et al. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of NBI, laser-BLI and LED-BLI: A randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Surg. Endosc. 36(10), 7577–7587 (2022).
3. Chang, A., Munjit, P., Sriprayoon, T., Pongpaibul, A. & Parachayakul, V. Comparison of blue laser imaging and narrow band imaging for the differentiation of diminutive colorectal polyps: A randomized controlled trial. Surg. Endosc. 3, 5743–5752 (2022).
4. Figueiredo, P. N. et al. "Polyp detection with computer-aided diagnosis in white light colonoscopy: Comparison of three different methods. Endosc. Int. Open 2, 13 (2019).
5. Wang, P. et al. Lower adenoma miss rate of computer-aided detection-assisted colonoscopy vs routine white-light colonoscopy in a prospective tandem study. Gastroenterology 4, 1252–1261 (2020).