Comparison of postoperative hypersensitivity between Total-etch and Universal adhesive system: a randomized clinical trial

Author:

Javed Kiran,Noor Nouman,Nasir Muhammad Zubair,Manzoor Manzoor Ahmed

Abstract

AbstractThe objective was to determine the postoperative hypersensitivity of two-step Total-etch as compared to one-step Universal adhesives followed by composite restorations on 100 patients by applying Total-etch on one tooth and Universal adhesive on another tooth. The bonds and teeth were randomly selected. Postoperative hypersensitivity was recorded by visual analog scale before, immediately after, and 24 h after the restoration using cold stimulus. The Mann–Whitney test was applied for statistical comparison of postoperative hypersensitivity between the two bonds as well as for any significant difference in genders with each bond. No significant difference was found between postoperative hypersensitivity of the two adhesives before (p-value = 0.57), immediately after (p-value = 0.604), and 24 h after (p-value = 0.728) the restoration. Males showed more hypersensitivity with Total-etch as compared to females before (p-value = 0.037), immediately after (p-value = 0.047), and 24 h after the restoration (p-value = 0.022). No significant difference was found between gender and Universal adhesive at all three stages (p-value > 0.05). The results suggest no significant difference in postoperative hypersensitivity between the two materials when good sample size and proper technique were observed along with the removal of bias like different patients having different pain perceptions and multiple operators having different operating skills. Males showed more hypersensitivity to Total-etch.Trial registration number: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials. Registry number: ACTRN12622001213730. (Retrospectively registered: 09/09/2022).

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference20 articles.

1. Toshniwal, N., Singh, N., Dhanjani, V., Mote, N. & Mani, S. Self-etching system v/s conventional bonding: Advantages, disadvantages. Int. J. Appl. Dent. Sci. 5, 379–383 (2019).

2. Rathore, M., Singh, A. & Pant, V. A. The dental amalgam toxicity fear: A myth or actuality. Toxicol. Int. 19, 81–88 (2012).

3. Amin, M., Naz, F., Sheikh, A. & Ahmed, A. Post-operative sensitivity in teeth restored with posterior dental composites using self-etch and Total-etch adhesives. J. Pak. Dent. Assoc. 24, 22–28 (2015).

4. Soares, C. J. et al. Polymerization shrinkage stress of composite resins and resin cements—what do we need to know?. Braz. Oral Res. 31, 1 (2017).

5. Davari, A. R., Ataei, E. & Assarzadeh, H. Dentin hypersensitivity: Etiology, diagnosis and treatment; a literature review. J. Dent. 14, 136–145 (2013).

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3