Abstract
AbstractContrafreeloading—working to access food that could be freely obtained—is rarely exhibited and poorly understood. Based on data from Grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus), researchers proposed a correlation between contrafreeloading and play: that contrafreeloading is more likely when subjects view the task as play. We tested that hypothesis by subjecting a relatively more playful parrot species, the kea (Nestor notabilis), to the same experimental tasks. Experiment 1 presented eight kea with container pairs holding more- or less-preferred free or enclosed food items, and examined three types of contrafreeloading: calculated (working to access preferred food over less-preferred, freely available food); classic (working to access food identical to freely available food); and super (working to access less-preferred food over preferred, freely available food). At the group level, the kea behaved similarly to the Greys: They significantly preferred calculated contrafreeloading, performed classic contrafreeloading at chance, and significantly failed to super contrafreeload. However, overall kea engaged in more contrafreeloading than Greys. Experiment 2 examined a potentially more ecologically relevant task, a choice between shelled and unshelled walnuts. No kea contrafreeloaded for nuts, whereas two of five Greys significantly preferred nut contrafreeloading and one chose at chance. We examine proximate and adaptive explanations for the performances of these differentially playful parrot species to further elucidate the role of play in contrafreeloading.
Funder
Diverse Intelligences Summer Institute
Templeton World Charity Foundation
University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference55 articles.
1. Charnov, E. L. & Orians, G. H. Optimal Foraging: Some Theoretical Considerations (University of Washington, 1973).
2. Skinner, B. F. The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis (Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1938).
3. Hull, C. L. Principles of Behavior: An Introduction to Behavior Theory (Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1943).
4. Jensen, G. D. Preference for bar pressing over ‘freeloading’ as a function of number of rewarded presses. J. Exp. Psychol. 65, 451–454 (1963).
5. Menzel, E. W. Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Problem seeking versus the bird-in-hand, least-effort strategy. Primates 32, 497–508 (1991).
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献