Surveillance of Enterococcus spp. reveals distinct species and antimicrobial resistance diversity across a One-Health continuum
-
Published:2020-03-03
Issue:1
Volume:10
Page:
-
ISSN:2045-2322
-
Container-title:Scientific Reports
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sci Rep
Author:
Zaheer Rahat,Cook Shaun R.,Barbieri Ruth,Goji Noriko,Cameron Andrew,Petkau Aaron,Polo Rodrigo Ortega,Tymensen Lisa,Stamm Courtney,Song Jiming,Hannon Sherry,Jones Tineke,Church Deirdre,Booker Calvin W.,Amoako Kingsley,Van Domselaar Gary,Read Ron R.,McAllister Tim A.
Abstract
AbstractFor a One-Health investigation of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Enterococcus spp., isolates from humans and beef cattle along with abattoirs, manured fields, natural streams, and wastewater from both urban and cattle feedlot sources were collected over two years. Species identification of Enterococcus revealed distinct associations across the continuum. Of the 8430 isolates collected, Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis were the main species in urban wastewater (90%) and clinical human isolates (99%); Enterococcus hirae predominated in cattle (92%) and feedlot catch-basins (60%), whereas natural streams harbored environmental Enterococcus spp. Whole-genome sequencing of E. faecalis (n = 366 isolates) and E. faecium (n = 342 isolates), revealed source clustering of isolates, indicative of distinct adaptation to their respective environments. Phenotypic resistance to tetracyclines and macrolides encoded by tet(M) and erm(B) respectively, was prevalent among Enterococcus spp. regardless of source. For E. faecium from cattle, resistance to β-lactams and quinolones was observed among 3% and 8% of isolates respectively, compared to 76% and 70% of human clinical isolates. Clinical vancomycin-resistant E. faecium exhibited high rates of multi-drug resistance, with resistance to all β-lactam, macrolides, and quinolones tested. Differences in the AMR profiles among isolates reflected antimicrobial use practices in each sector of the One-Health continuum.
Funder
Beef Cattle Research Council Genomics Research and Development Initiative of the Government of Canada
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Multidisciplinary
Reference91 articles.
1. Byappanahalli, M. N., Nevers, M. B., Korajkic, A., Staley, Z. R. & Harwood, V. J. Enterococci in the Environment. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 76, 685–706 (2012). 2. Staley, C., Dunny, G. M. & Sadowsky, M. J. Environmental and animal-associated enterococci. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 87, 147–186 (2014). 3. Yost, C. K., Diarra, M. S., & Topp, E. Animals and humans as sources of fecal indicator bacteria in The Fecal Bacteria (eds. Sadowsky, M. J., & Whitman, R. L.) Chapter 4; 67–91, https://doi.org/10.1128/9781555816865. (ASM Press, Washington, DC, 2011). 4. Ashbolt, N. J., Grabow, W. O. K., & Snozzi, M. Indicators of microbial water quality in Water quality-Guidelines, standards and health: Assessment of risk and risk management for water-related infectious disease. (eds. Fewtrell, L. & Bartram, J.). 289–315 Available from https://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/whoiwa/en/ (IWA Publishing, London, United Kingdom, 2001). 5. Leclerc, H., Devriese, L. A. & Mossel, D. A. A. Taxonomical changes in intestinal (faecal) enterococci and streptococci: Consequences on their use as indicators of faecal contamination in drinking water. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 81, 459–466 (1996).
Cited by
157 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|