Author:
Opuwari Mimonitu,Afolayan Blessing,Mohammed Saeed,Amaechi Paschal Ogechukwu,Bareja Youmssi,Chatterjee Tapas
Abstract
AbstractThis study aims to generate rock units based on core permeability and porosity of OW oilfield in the Bredasdorp Basin offshore South Africa. In this study, we identified and classified lithofacies based on sedimentology reports in conjunction with well logs. Lucia's petrophysical classification method is used to classify rocks into three classes. Results revealed three lithofacies as A (sandstone, coarse to medium-grained), B (fine to medium-grained sandstone), and C (carbonaceous claystone, finely laminated with siltstone). Lithofacies A is the best reservoir quality and corresponds to class 1, while lithofacies B and C correspond to class 2 and 3, which are good and poor reservoir quality rock, respectively. An integrated reservoir zonation for the rocks is based on four different zonation methods (Flow Zone indicator (FZI), Winland r35, Hydraulic conductivity (HC), and Stratigraphy modified Lorenz plot (SMLP)). Four flow zones Reservoir rock types (RRTs) were identified as RRT1, RRT3, RRT4, and RRT5, respectively. The RRT5 is the best reservoir quality composed of a megaporous rock unit, with an average FZI value between 5 and 10 µm, and HC from 40 to 120 mD/v3, ranked as very good. The most prolific flow units (RRT5 and RRT4 zones) form more than 75% of each well's flow capacities are supplied by two flow units (FU1 and FU3). The RRT1 is the most reduced rock quality composed of impervious and nanoporous rock. Quartz is the dominant framework grain, and siderite is the dominant cement that affects flow zones. This study has demonstrated a robust approach to delineate flow units in the OW oilfield. We have developed a useful regional petrophysical reservoir rock flow zonation model for clastic reservoir sediments. This study has produced, for the first time, insights into the petrophysical properties of the OW oilfield from the Bredasdorp Basin South Africa, based on integration of core and mineralogy data. A novel sandstone reservoir zonation classification criteria developed from this study can be applied to other datasets of sandstone reservoirs with confidence.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference70 articles.
1. Revil, A. & Cathles Iii, L. M. Permeability of shaly sands. Water Resour. Res. 35, 651–662 (1999).
2. Lala, A. M. S. & El-Sayed, N. A. Controls of pore throat radius distribution on permeability. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 157, 941–950 (2017).
3. Spears, R. W. et al. Shale gas core analysis: Strategies for normalizing between laboratories and a clear need for standard materials. In SPWLA 52nd Annual Logging Symposium (OnePetro, 2011).
4. Blount, A., McMullen, A., Durand, M., Croft, T. & Driskill, B. Maintaining and reconstructing in-situ saturations: A comparison between whole core, sidewall core, and pressurized sidewall core in the Permian basin. In SPWLA 59th Annual Logging Symposium (OnePetro, 2018).
5. Ma, S. M. & Amabeoku, M. Core analysis with emphasis on carbonate rocks—quality assurance and control for accuracy and representativeness. Interpretation 3, SA91–SA106 (2015).