Author:
Sinnott Christian B.,Hausamann Peter A.,MacNeilage Paul R.
Abstract
AbstractHead orientation relative to gravity determines how gravity-dependent environmental structure is sampled by the visual system, as well as how gravity itself is sampled by the vestibular system. Therefore, both visual and vestibular sensory processing should be shaped by the statistics of head orientation relative to gravity. Here we report the statistics of human head orientation during unconstrained natural activities in humans for the first time, and we explore implications for models of vestibular processing. We find that the distribution of head pitch is more variable than head roll and that the head pitch distribution is asymmetrical with an over-representation of downward head pitch, consistent with ground-looking behavior. We further suggest that pitch and roll distributions can be used as empirical priors in a Bayesian framework to explain previously measured biases in perception of both roll and pitch. Gravitational and inertial acceleration stimulate the otoliths in an equivalent manner, so we also analyze the dynamics of human head orientation to better understand how knowledge of these dynamics can constrain solutions to the problem of gravitoinertial ambiguity. Gravitational acceleration dominates at low frequencies and inertial acceleration dominates at higher frequencies. The change in relative power of gravitational and inertial components as a function of frequency places empirical constraints on dynamic models of vestibular processing, including both frequency segregation and probabilistic internal model accounts. We conclude with a discussion of methodological considerations and scientific and applied domains that will benefit from continued measurement and analysis of natural head movements moving forward.
Funder
National Institutes of Health,United States
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference42 articles.
1. MacNeilage, P. R. Characterization of Natural Head Movements in Animals and Humans. In The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference (eds Fritzsch, B. & Straka, H.) 6987 (Elsevier, Academic Press, 2020).
2. Wei, X.-X. & Stocker, A. A. A bayesian observer model constrained by efficient coding can explain “anti-bayesian’’ percepts. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1509–1517 (2015).
3. Wei, X.-X. & Stocker, A. A. Lawful relation between perceptual bias and discriminability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 10244–10249 (2017).
4. Carriot, J., Jamali, M., Chacron, M. J. & Cullen, K. E. Statistics of the vestibular input experienced during natural self-motion: Implications for vestibular processing. J. Neurosci. 34, 8347–8357 (2014).
5. Carriot, J., Jamali, M., Cullen, K. E. & Chacron, M. J. Envelope statistics of self-motion signals experienced by human subjects during everyday activities: Implications for vestibular processing. PLoS ONE 12, 1–24 (2017).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献