Abstract
AbstractMany studies seeking to understand the success of biological invasions focus on species’ escape from negative interactions, such as damage from herbivores, pathogens, or predators in their introduced range (enemy release). However, much less work has been done to assess the possibility that introduced species might shed mutualists such as pollinators, seed dispersers, and mycorrhizae when they are transported to a new range. We ran a cross-continental field study and found that plants were being visited by 2.6 times more potential pollinators with 1.8 times greater richness in their native range than in their introduced range. Understanding both the positive and negative consequences of introduction to a new range can help us predict, monitor, and manage future invasion events.
Funder
Australian Government
University of New South Wales
Evolution & Ecology Research Centre at UNSW
Ecological Society of Australia
Australian Research Council
Eesti Teadusagentuur
European Regional Development Fund
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference72 articles.
1. Pyšek, P. et al. Successful invaders co-opt pollinators of native flora and accumulate insect pollinators with increasing residence time. Ecol. Monogr. 81, 277–293 (2011).
2. Shine, R. The ecological impact of invasive Cane Toads (Bufo marinus) in Australia. Q. Rev. Biol. 85, 253–291 (2010).
3. Vitousek, P. M., D’Antonio, C. M., Loope, L. L. & Westbrooks, R. Biological invasions as global environmental change. Am. Sci. 84, 468–478 (1996).
4. Blossey, B. & Nötzold, R. Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: A hypothesis. J. Ecol. 83, 887–889 (1995).
5. Keane, R. M. & Crawley, M. J. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 164–170 (2002).