Abstract
AbstractThe incidences of various esophageal diseases (e.g., congenital esophageal stenosis, tracheoesophageal fistula, esophageal atresia, esophageal cancer) are increasing, but esophageal tissue is difficult to be recovered because of its weak regenerative capability. There are no commercialized off-the-shelf alternatives to current esophageal reconstruction and regeneration methods. Surgeons usually use ectopic conduit tissues including stomach and intestine, presumably inducing donor site morbidity and severe complications. To date, polymer-based esophageal substitutes have been studied as an alternative. However, the fabrication techniques are nearly limited to creating only cylindrical outer shapes with the help of additional apparatus (e.g., mandrels for electrospinning) and are unable to recapitulate multi-layered characteristic or complex-shaped inner architectures. 3D bioprinting is known as a suitable method to fabricate complex free-form tubular structures with desired pore characteristic. In this study, we developed a extrusion-based 3D printing technique to control the size and the shape of the pore in a single extrusion process, so that the fabricated structure has a higher flexibility than that fabricated in the conventional process. Based on this suggested technique, we developed a bioprinted 3D esophageal structure with multi-layered features and converged with biochemical microenvironmental cues of esophageal tissue by using decellularizedbioinks from mucosal and muscular layers of native esophageal tissues. The two types of esophageal tissue derived-decellularized extracellular matrix bioinks can mimic the inherent components and composition of original tissues with layer specificity. This structure can be applied to full-thickness circumferential esophageal defects and esophageal regeneration.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference49 articles.
1. Ellis, F. H. Jr Standard resection for cancer of the esophagus and cardia. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 8, 279–294 (1999).
2. Yildirim, S. et al. Colonic interposition vs. gastric pull-up after total esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 8, 675–678 (2004).
3. Hamza, A. F. Colonic replacement in cases of esophageal atresia. Semin Pediatr Surg 18, 40–43 (2009).
4. Yoshida, N. et al. Risk factors for pulmonary complications after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Today 44, 526–532 (2014).
5. Kulkarni, A. A., Chauhan, V., Sharma, V. & Singh, H. Gastric Conduit Perforation: A Late Fatal Complication after Esophagectomy. Cureus 11, e4987 (2019).
Cited by
46 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献