Author:
Tran Dominic M. D.,Nicholson William G.,Harris Justin A.,Harris Irina M.,Livesey Evan J.
Abstract
AbstractEnvironmental cues associated with an action can prime the motor system, decreasing response times and activating motor regions of the brain. However, when task goals change, the same responses to former go-associated cues are no longer required and motor priming needs to be inhibited to avoid unwanted behavioural errors. The present study tested whether the inhibition of motor system activity to presentations of former go cues is reliant on top-down, goal-directed cognitive control processes using a working memory (WM) load manipulation. Applying transcranial magnetic stimulation over the primary motor cortex to measure motor system activity during a Go/No-go task, we found that under low WM, corticospinal excitability was suppressed to former go and trained no-go cues relative to control cues. Under high WM, the cortical suppression to former go cues was reduced, suggesting that the underlying mechanism required executive control. Unexpectedly, we found a similar result for trained no-go cues and showed in a second experiment that the corticospinal suppression and WM effects were unrelated to local inhibitory function as indexed by short-interval intracortical inhibition. Our findings reveal that the interaction between former response cues and WM is complex and we discuss possible explanations of our findings in relation to models of response inhibition.
Funder
National Research Council for Economics, Humanities and Social Science
Australian Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference44 articles.
1. Tucker, M. & Ellis, R. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24, 830–846 (1998).
2. Barrett, L. C. & Livesey, E. J. Dissociations between expectancy and performance in simple and two-choice reaction-time tasks: A test of associative and nonassociative explanations. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 36(4), 864 (2010).
3. Lee Cheong Lem, V. A., Harris, J. A. & Livesey, E. J. Testing the limits of the Perruchet effect in choice response time tasks. J. Exp. Psychol.: Anim. Learn. Cognit. 41(4), 385 (2015).
4. Grafton, S. T., Fadiga, L., Arbib, M. A. & Rizzolatti, G. Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. Neuroimage 6, 231–236 (1997).
5. Chao, L. L. & Martin, A. Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage 12(4), 478–484 (2000).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献