ChatGPT's performance before and after teaching in mass casualty incident triage

Author:

Gan Rick KyeORCID,Uddin HelalORCID,Gan Ann ZeeORCID,Yew Ying YingORCID,González Pedro ArcosORCID

Abstract

AbstractSince its initial launching, ChatGPT has gained significant attention from the media, with many claiming that ChatGPT’s arrival is a transformative milestone in the advancement of the AI revolution. Our aim was to assess the performance of ChatGPT before and after teaching the triage of mass casualty incidents by utilizing a validated questionnaire specifically designed for such scenarios. In addition, we compared the triage performance between ChatGPT and medical students. Our cross-sectional study employed a mixed-methods analysis to assess the performance of ChatGPT in mass casualty incident triage, pre- and post-teaching of Simple Triage And Rapid Treatment (START) triage. After teaching the START triage algorithm, ChatGPT scored an overall triage accuracy of 80%, with only 20% of cases being over-triaged. The mean accuracy of medical students on the same questionnaire yielded 64.3%. Qualitative analysis on pre-determined themes on ‘walking-wounded’, ‘respiration’, ‘perfusion’, and ‘mental status’ on ChatGPT showed similar performance in pre- and post-teaching of START triage. Additional themes on ‘disclaimer’, ‘prediction’, ‘management plan’, and ‘assumption’ were identified during the thematic analysis. ChatGPT exhibited promising results in effectively responding to mass casualty incident questionnaires. Nevertheless, additional research is necessary to ensure its safety and efficacy before clinical implementation.

Funder

Karolinska Institute

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference52 articles.

1. Analysis | Is ChatGPT the Start of the AI Revolution? Washington Post (2022).

2. Is ChatGPT the Start of the AI Revolution? - Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-12-09/is-chatgpt-the-start-of-the-ai-revolution#xj4y7vzkg?leadSource=uverify wall.

3. Krügel, S., Ostermaier, A. & Uhl, M. ChatGPT’s inconsistent moral advice influences users’ judgment. Sci. Rep. 13, 4569 (2023).

4. Heilweil, R. AI is finally good at stuff. Now what? Vox https://www.vox.com/recode/2022/12/7/23498694/ai-artificial-intelligence-chat-gpt-openai (2022).

5. EIT Health and McKinsey & Company. Transforming healthcare with AI-The impact on the workforce and organisations. (2020).

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3