Author:
Akenroye Ayobami,Nopsopon Tanawin,Hacker Jonathan J.,Laidlaw Tanya M.
Abstract
AbstractTo date, most studies to identify biomarkers associated with response to the anti-interleukin 5 agent, mepolizumab, and to the anti-immunoglobulin E agent, omalizumab have focused on clinically available biomarkers, such as the peripheral blood eosinophil counts (BEC) and total immunoglobulin E (IgE). However, these biomarkers often have low predictive accuracy, with many patients with eosinophilic or allergic asthma failing to demonstrate clinical response to mepolizumab or omalizumab respectively. In this study, we evaluated the association of baseline pre-biologic plasma levels of 26 cytokines and chemokines, including T-helper 1 (Th1)-, Th2-, Th17-related cytokines, and their ratios with subsequent clinical response to mepolizumab or omalizumab. We defined clinical response as a reduction in the baseline annual exacerbation rate by half or more over the one-year period following initiation of the biologic. Baseline levels of plasma IL-13 were differentially elevated in responders versus non-responders to mepolizumab and plasma CXCL10 levels were differentially elevated in responders to omalizumab. The ratio of IL-13/TNF-α had the best sensitivity and specificity in predicting response to mepolizumab and CXCL10/CCL17 to omalizumab, and these performed better as predictive biomarkers of response than BEC and IgE. Cytokines and chemokines associated with airway eosinophilia, allergic inflammation, or Th2 inflammation, such as IL-13 and CXCL10, may be better predictors of clinical response to mepolizumab and omalizumab, than IL-5 or IgE, the targets of mepolizumab and omalizumab.
Funder
American Lung Association/American Thoracic Society/CHEST Foundation Respiratory Health Equity Research Award
Harvard Medical School Diversity, Inclusion, and Community Partnership (HMS DICP) Faculty Fellowship
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference64 articles.
1. Brusselle, G. G. & Koppelman, G. H. Biologic therapies for severe asthma. N. Engl. J. Med. 386, 157–171 (2022).
2. Akenroye, A., et al. Comparative efficacy of mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. (2022).
3. Akenroye, A. T. et al. Comparative effectiveness of omalizumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab in asthma: A target trial emulation. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 151, 1269–1276 (2023).
4. Akenroye, A., McCormack, M. & Keet, C. Severe asthma in the US population and eligibility for mAb therapy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 145, 1295-1297.e1296 (2020).
5. Akenroye, A., et al. Switch patterns in a cohort of individuals with asthma who received omalizumab or mepolizumab therapy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. (2022).