Author:
Hemayati Saeed Sadeghzadeh,Hamdi Farahnaz,Saremirad Ali,Hamze Hamze
Abstract
AbstractThis research assessed the quantitative and qualitative reactions of commercially grown sugar beets to four different harvest dates and their yield stability. The study followed a split-plot design within a randomized complete block design over 3 years. The main plot involved 10 sugar beet cultivars, while the subplot involved four harvest dates: August 13 (HD1), September 7 (HD2), October 3 (HD3), and November 12 (HD4). The study found that environmental conditions, genotypes, and harvest dates significantly affected various traits of sugar beet. Yearly environmental variations and their interactions with genotypes and harvest dates had substantial impacts on all measured traits at the 1% probability level. Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction analysis based on white sugar yield indicated that genotype and environment's additive effects, as well as the genotype–environment interaction, were significant at 1% probability level. Shokoufa and Arya, which exhibit high white sugar yield (WSY) and low first interaction principal component (IPC1) values, are identified as desirable due to their stability across different environments. Among the harvest dates in different years, the fourth and third dates showed a higher yield than the total average. Perfekta and Ekbatan exhibited high specific adaptability. According to the multi-trait stability index, Arta, Arya and Sina were recognized as stable and superior across all measured traits.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference65 articles.
1. United Nations. World Population Prospects 2019: Highlights (Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division). Retrieved from Retrieved from 2019.
2. Saremirad, A. & Mostafavi, K. Genetic diversity study of sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) genotypes for agro-morphological traits under normal and drought stress conditions. Plant Prod. 43, 227–240. https://doi.org/10.22055/ppd.2020.27588.1671 (2020).
3. Eggleston, G. History of sugar and sweeteners. In Chap. 5 in Chemistry’s Role in Food Production and Sustainability: Past and Present (eds Orna, M. V. et al.) 63–74 (American Chemical Society, 2019).
4. Akyüz, A. & Ersus, S. Optimization of enzyme assisted extraction of protein from the sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) leaves for alternative plant protein concentrate production. Food Chem. 335, 127673 (2021).
5. Monteiro, F. et al. Genetic and genomic tools to asssist sugar beet improvement: The value of the crop wild relatives. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 74–85 (2018).