Abstract
AbstractPrevious studies of Brain Computer Interfaces (BCI) based on scalp electroencephalography (EEG) have demonstrated the feasibility of decoding kinematics for lower limb movements during walking. In this computational study, we investigated offline decoding analysis with different models and conditions to assess how they influence the performance and stability of the decoder. Specifically, we conducted three computational decoding experiments that investigated decoding accuracy: (1) based on delta band time-domain features, (2) when downsampling data, (3) of different frequency band features. In each experiment, eight different decoder algorithms were compared including the current state-of-the-art. Different tap sizes (sample window sizes) were also evaluated for a real-time applicability assessment. A feature of importance analysis was conducted to ascertain which features were most relevant for decoding; moreover, the stability to perturbations was assessed to quantify the robustness of the methods. Results indicated that generally the Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) and Quasi Recurrent Neural Network (QRNN) outperformed other methods in terms of decoding accuracy and stability. Previous state-of-the-art Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF) still outperformed other decoders when using smaller tap sizes, with fast convergence in performance, but occurred at a cost to noise vulnerability. Downsampling and the inclusion of other frequency band features yielded overall improvement in performance. The results suggest that neural network-based decoders with downsampling or a wide range of frequency band features could not only improve decoder performance but also robustness with applications for stable use of BCIs.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference45 articles.
1. Glaser, J. I., Benjamin, A. S., Farhoodi, R. & Kording, K. P. The roles of supervised machine learning in systems neuroscience. Prog. neurobiology (2019).
2. Leuthardt, E. C., Schalk, G., Wolpaw, J. R., Ojemann, J. G. & Moran, D. W. A brain-computer interface using electrocorticographic signals in humans. J. neural engineering 1, 63 (2004).
3. Dobkin, B. H. Brain-computer interface technology as a tool to augment plasticity and outcomes for neurological rehabilitation. The J. physiology 579, 637–642 (2007).
4. Glaser, J. I., Chowdhury, R. H., Perich, M. G., Miller, L. E. & Kording, K. P. Machine learning for neural decoding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.00909 (2017).
5. Lotte, F., Congedo, M., Lécuyer, A., Lamarche, F. & Arnaldi, B. A review of classification algorithms for eeg-based brain-computer interfaces. J. neural engineering 4, R1 (2007).
Cited by
63 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献