Author:
Nguyen Anh T. Q.,Nguyen Minh N.
Abstract
AbstractRice production helps feed at least half of the world’s population but generates approximately one billion tonnes of straw residue per annum. On-site open burning of rice straw after harvesting is common in recent times because there has been less demand for rice straw to use as fuel and fodder. Due to health and climate change concerns, open burning, which results in biomass losses, smog and emissions of green house gases, e.g., CO2, has been widely criticized and banned in many countries. Little is known about the positive benefits of straw burning, such as field care (eradication of biotic diseases) or nutrient cycling. Herein, we propose a new viewpoint in which the burning of rice straw followed by cycling of the burned materials, including silica material (so-called phytolith), into soil is demonstrated as a CO2-sequestration strategy via buffering the soil CO2 flux and coupling CO2 with the silicon cycle.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. Gustafsson, Ö. et al. Brown Clouds over South Asia: Biomass or Fossil Fuel Combustion? Science 323, 495–498 (2009).
2. Tore, A. Thinking Glocal to solve India’s paddy-straw burning crisis. Agriculture News in Down To Earth (2019).
3. Pandey, P., Valkenburg, G., Mamidipudi, A. & Bijker, W. E. The key to resolving straw burning: farmers’ expertise. Policy brief on missing cultural perspectives. Maastricht, the Netherlands: Maastricht University (2017).
4. Vagg, A. Rice straw utilisation - Value adding and alternative uses for the Australian rice industry. In “A report for Nuffield Australia farming scholars”. Nuffield Australia (2015).
5. Beerling, D. J. et al. Farming with crops and rocks to address global climate, food and soil security. Nature Plants 4, 138–147 (2018).
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献