Author:
Tsao Chi-Hui,Wu Kuan-Yu,Su Nicole Ching,Edwards Andrew,Huang Guo-Jen
Abstract
AbstractAnimal models have been used extensively in in vivo studies, especially within the biomedical field. Traditionally, single-sex studies, mostly males, are used to avoid any potential confounding variation caused by sex difference and the female estrous cycle. Historically, female animal subjects are believed to exhibit higher variability, and this could increase the statistical power needed to test a hypothesis. This study sets out to evaluate whether a sex difference does exist in mouse behavior, and whether female mice featured higher variability. We assessed the sensorimotor skills, anxiety-like behavior, depression-like behavior, and cognitive abilities of mice through a series of commonly used behavioral tests. Except for the stronger grip force and lower tactile sensory sensitivity detected in male mice, there was no significant difference between males and females in other tests. Furthermore, immunolabeling of neurogenesis markers suggested no significant difference between sexes in adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Within group variances were equivalent; females did not exhibit higher variability than males. However, the overall negative results could be due to the limitation of small sample size. In conclusion, our study provides evidence that sex difference in mice does not significantly influence these commonly used behavioral tests nor adult neurogenesis under basal conditions. We suggest that female mice could also be considered for test inclusion in future experiment design.
Funder
National Science and Technology Council of Taiwan
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference61 articles.
1. Ericsson, A. C., Crim, M. J. & Franklin, C. L. A brief history of animal modeling. Mo. Med. 110, 201 (2013).
2. Perlman, R. L. Mouse models of human disease: An evolutionary perspective. Evol., Med., Public Health 2016, 170–176 (2016).
3. Levine, S. Sex differences in the brain. Sci. Am. 214, 84–92 (1966).
4. Johnston, A. L. & File, S. E. Sex differences in animal tests of anxiety. Physiol. Behav. 49, 245–250 (1991).
5. Kokras, N. & Dalla, C. Sex differences in animal models of psychiatric disorders. Br. J. Pharmacol. 171, 4595–4619 (2014).
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献