Author:
Xie Jie-Hui,Tian Fu-Jun,Li Xue-Yuan,Chen Yu-Qing,Li Shi-Yi
Abstract
AbstractFarmers' participation in food safety governance is an important part of food safety social co-governance, and the accurate identification of its influencing factors and their related paths is of guiding significance to the scientific decision-making of food safety governance. The system of influencing factors of farmers' participation in food safety governance was constructed from four dimensions, and the influence network of each dimension was revealed by decision laboratory analysis (DEMATEL). The hierarchical structure and correlation path of influencing factors were determined by interpretive structural model (ISM), and the attributes of influencing factors were further classified by cross influence matrix multiplication (MICMAC). The results show that the influencing factors of farmers' participation in food safety governance can be divided into seven levels, among which the level of education and the status of village cadres are the fundamental characteristic factors. The degree of rural informatization, the intensity of government supervision, the promotion of village committees, the response of the government and the degree of disclosure of government information are the deep core factors, and risk cognition, political trust and family eating habits are special factors. Taking the importance and attribute status of farmers' participation in food safety governance into decision-making considerations is of great significance to improve the efficiency of food safety governance.
Funder
Fujian Social Science Research Base
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. Zhang Bei, Qu. & Jinlan, M. R. The complexity and resolution of food safety supervision in rural China. World Agric. 08, 24–32 (2021).
2. Huo Longxia, Xu. & Guochong.,. Towards cooperative supervision: the evolution logic of food safety supervision methods since the reform and opening up—Based on the content analysis of 438 central policy texts (1979–2017). Public Manag. Rev. 2(01), 68–91 (2020).
3. Henson, S. & Hooker, N. H. Private sector management of foodsafety: public regulation and the role of private controls. Int. Food Agribus. Manag. Rev. 4(1), 7–17 (2001).
4. Cope, S. et al. Consumer perceptionsof best practice in food risk communication and management: Implications for risk analysis policy. Food Policy 35(4), 349–357 (2010).
5. Van Truong, A., Lang, B. & Conroy Denise, M. When food governance matters to consumer food choice: Consumer perception of and preference for food quality certifications. Appetite 168, 105688–105688 (2022).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献