Drone Surveys Do Not Increase Colony-wide Flight Behaviour at Waterbird Nesting Sites, But Sensitivity Varies Among Species

Author:

Barr Jared R.,Green M. Clay,DeMaso Stephen J.,Hardy Thomas B.

Abstract

AbstractThe popularity of using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to survey colonial waterbirds has increased in the past decade, but disturbance associated with this bourgeoning technology requires further study. Disturbance was investigated by conducting aerial surveys with a consumer-grade quadcopter (DJI Phantom 3), while concurrently recording behavioural reactions on video. Surveys of mixed-species waterbird colonies (1-6 species per colony) were flown in horizontal transects at heights of 122, 91, 61, and 46 m, which is a typical range for collecting aerial imagery and producing high-resolution mosaicked orthophotos of nesting bird sites. An upper limit of 122 m was used due to local regulations prohibiting higher-altitude flights without federal authorization. Behavioural reactions were tallied every minute and a disturbance score was calculated for each sampling period. When compared to control periods, we found no evidence that colony-wide escape (i.e., flight) behaviour increased during drone flights, at any altitude flown. However, disturbance score increased significantly by 53% for surveys at 46 m. Some species were more sensitive to surveys than others. Laughing Gulls, in particular, exhibited a significant (125%) increase in escape behaviour for surveys at 91 m. Our results indicate when used in a capacity to gather high-resolution imagery for estimating breeding pairs, UAV surveys affected some species more than others, but severe reactions did not appear to increase for mixed-species colonies as a whole. Further study on safe operating thresholds is essential, especially at local and regional scales.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference57 articles.

1. Wiens, J. A. & Addicott, J. F. Overview: the importance of spatial and temporal scale in ecological investigations In Community Ecology (eds. Diamond, J. & Case, T. J.) 145–153 (Harper and Row, 1986).

2. Temple, S. A. & Wiens, J. A. Bird populations and environmental changes: can birds be bio-indicators? American Birds 43, 260–270 (1989).

3. Coulter, M. C. & Frederick, P. C. Movements and population dynamics of colonial waterbirds as guides for the temporal and spatial scales of conservation. Colonial Waterbirds 20, 295–297 (1997).

4. Nisbet, I. C. T. Disturbance, habituation, and management of waterbird colonies. Waterbirds 23, 312–332 (2000).

5. Kury, C. R. & Gochfeld, M. Human interference and gull predation in cormorant colonies. Biological Conservation 8, 24–34 (1975).

Cited by 36 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3