Author:
Sapkota Ranjan,Stenger John,Ostlie Michael,Flores Paulo
Abstract
AbstractCurrently, applying uniform distribution of chemical herbicide through a sprayer without considering the spatial distribution information of crops and weeds is the most common method of controlling weeds in commercial agricultural production system. This kind of weed management practice lead to excessive amounts of chemical herbicides being applied in a given field. The objective of this study was to perform site-specific weed control (SSWC) in a corn field by: (1) using a unmanned aerial system (UAS) to map the spatial distribution information of weeds in the field; (2) creating a prescription map based on the weed distribution map, and (3) spraying the field using the prescription map and a commercial size sprayer. In this study, we assumed that plants growing outside the corn rows are weeds and they need to be controlled. The first step in implementing such an approach is identifying the corn rows. For that, we are proposing a Crop Row Identification algorithm, a computer vision algorithm that identifies corn rows on UAS imagery. After being identified, the corn rows were then removed from the imagery and remaining vegetation fraction was classified as weeds. Based on that information, a grid-based weed prescription map was created and the weed control application was implemented through a commercial-size sprayer. The decision of spraying herbicides on a particular grid was based on the presence of weeds in that grid cell. All the grids that contained at least one weed were sprayed, while the grids free of weeds were not. Using our SSWC approach, we were able to save 26.2% of the acreage from being sprayed with herbicide compared to the current method. This study presents a full workflow from UAS image collection to field weed control implementation using a commercial size sprayer, and it shows that some level of savings can potentially be obtained even in a situation with high weed infestation, which might provide an opportunity to reduce chemical usage in corn production systems.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference68 articles.
1. Feedgrains sector at a glance. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/crops/corn-and-other-feedgrains/feedgrains-sector-at-a-glance/ (2021).
2. Theng, D. et al. Fiberboards made from corn stalk thermomechanical pulp and kraft lignin as a green adhesive. BioResources 12, 2379–2393. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.12.2.2379-2393 (2017).
3. Garcia-Lara, S. & Serna-Saldivar, S. O. Corn history and culture. In Corn, 3rd edn (ed. Serna-Saldivar, S. O.) 1–18 (AACC International Press, 2019).
4. Dhiman, T. & Satter, L. Yield response of dairy cows fed different proportions of alfalfa silage and corn silage. J. Dairy Sci. 80, 2069–2082 (1997).
5. Pereira, L. G. et al. Comparison of biofuel life-cycle GHG emissions assessment tools: The case studies of ethanol produced from sugarcane, corn, and wheat. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 110, 1–12 (2019).
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献